Supplemental Figures for Uncovering mental structure through data-driven ontology discovery

This notebook contains:

  • Loading matrices for task, survey and outcome exploratory factor analyses
  • Robustness analysis for task and survey factor analyses
  • All clusters from the hierarchical clusting (Figures 4 and 5 from the main paper) separately plotted out with DVs labeled
  • Robustness analyses for hierarchical clustering, comparing the clustering reported in the paper to perturbed data and a consensus clustering approach
In [1]:
import matplotlib as mpl
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from os import path
import pandas as pd
import pickle
import seaborn as sns
pd.set_option('max_rows', 200)

from dimensional_structure import DA_plots
from dimensional_structure.EFA_cluster_robustness import ConsensusCluster
from dimensional_structure.EFA_plots import plot_heatmap_factors, plot_bar_factors, plot_factor_correlation
from dimensional_structure.HCA_plots import plot_subbranches, plot_results_dendrogram
from dimensional_structure.notebook_utils import (plot_factor_df, plot_EFA_robustness, 
                                                  plot_bootstrap_results,
                                                  plot_HCA_AMI,
                                                  display_closest_DVs,
                                                  display_cluster_DVs)
from selfregulation.utils.utils import get_recent_dataset
from selfregulation.utils.result_utils import load_results
Using TensorFlow backend.
/media/Data/Ian/miniconda/envs/SO/lib/python3.5/site-packages/IPython/parallel.py:13: ShimWarning: The `IPython.parallel` package has been deprecated since IPython 4.0. You should import from ipyparallel instead.
  "You should import from ipyparallel instead.", ShimWarning)
In [2]:
%matplotlib inline
dataset = get_recent_dataset()
results = load_results(datafile=dataset)

Exploratory Factor Analysis Results

Below are the loading matrices for the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) solutions for surveys, tasks, and the outcome measures.

Survey Exploratory Factor Analysis Loadings

12 factors were determined using a BIC criteria for exploratory factor analysis. The 64 survey DVs are grouped and ordered based on the largest (absolute) factor loading for that DV. Hover over the cells to see the exact value

In [3]:
fig = plt.figure(figsize=(12, 3))
ax1 = fig.add_axes([0.05, 0.80, 0.9, 0.15])
cmap = sns.diverging_palette(220,15,n=20, as_cmap=True)
cb1 = mpl.colorbar.ColorbarBase(ax1, cmap=cmap,
                                orientation='horizontal')
cb1.set_ticks([0,.5,1])
cb1.set_ticklabels(['-1','0', '1'])
cb1.set_label('Color Bar for Factor Loading Plots')
In [4]:
survey_results = results['survey']
plot_factor_df(survey_results.EFA)
Out[4]:
Mindfulness Emotional Control Goal-Directedness Agreeableness Reward Sensitivity Sensation Seeking Financial Risk-Taking Social Risk-Taking Ethical Risk-Taking Eating Control Impulsivity Risk Perception
five facet mindfulness survey: act with awareness 0.89 -0.016 0.051 -0.044 -0.01 0.0075 -0.0024 0.0023 -0.027 0.033 -0.024 0.019
mindful attention awareness survey: mindfulness 0.81 -0.015 -0.11 0.1 -0.015 -0.02 -0.018 0.0077 0.0025 -0.14 -0.023 -0.031
bis11 survey: Attentional -0.57 -0.21 -0.059 0.034 0.12 0.03 -0.012 0.045 0.00064 0.012 0.083 -0.006
five facet mindfulness survey: describe 0.41 0.14 0.087 0.16 0.16 -0.077 0.052 0.26 0.011 -0.017 0.038 0.015
brief self control survey: self control 0.28 0.18 0.22 0.1 -0.083 0.068 0.0094 -0.081 -0.081 -0.27 -0.26 0.041
ten item personality survey: emotional stability 0.082 0.71 -0.0071 0.044 0.02 0.049 0.037 0.0022 -0.023 -0.067 -0.028 -0.008
bis bas survey: BIS -0.066 -0.7 0.0074 0.25 0.0016 -0.06 -0.075 -0.024 -0.075 0.12 -0.087 0.066
time perspective survey: past negative -0.069 -0.57 -0.12 -0.24 0.033 0.076 -0.034 0.022 0.061 0.071 -0.096 0.11
five facet mindfulness survey: nonreact 0.083 0.48 -0.037 0.068 0.033 0.086 0.0059 0.15 0.0039 -0.028 -0.17 0.01
future time perspective survey: future time perspective -0.069 0.45 0.15 0.23 0.25 -0.035 0.0048 0.078 0.0004 0.0068 -0.05 0.044
five facet mindfulness survey: nonjudge 0.23 0.44 -0.082 0.12 0.00098 -0.16 -0.057 0.043 -0.11 -0.04 0.18 -0.06
erq survey: reappraisal 5.2e-05 0.36 0.066 0.23 0.18 0.071 -0.054 0.1 0.076 -0.0091 -0.1 0.063
eating survey: cognitive restraint -0.022 -0.14 0.11 -0.0082 0.068 0.0094 0.082 0.027 -0.035 -0.12 -0.12 0.092
selection optimization compensation survey: optimization: ReflogTr -0.13 -0.1 -0.59 -0.054 0.05 -0.11 -0.06 -0.016 0.0093 0.11 0.013 -0.054
selection optimization compensation survey: compensation -0.024 -0.0039 0.56 0.18 0.053 0.027 0.033 0.056 -0.0055 -0.17 0.016 0.036
time perspective survey: future 0.12 -0.16 0.5 -0.00028 0.015 -0.037 -0.08 0.016 -0.04 0.012 -0.43 0.065
selection optimization compensation survey: elective selection 0.24 -0.047 0.44 -0.053 -0.15 -0.046 0.033 -0.13 0.027 -0.017 0.012 0.057
grit scale survey: grit 0.41 0.21 0.43 -0.059 0.0058 0.082 -0.079 -0.02 -0.024 -0.091 -0.0098 0.072
upps impulsivity survey: lack of perseverance -0.31 -0.17 -0.4 0.052 -0.16 -0.086 0.093 -0.011 0.0042 -0.0058 0.3 -0.11
selection optimization compensation survey: loss based selection -0.13 -0.11 0.37 0.067 -0.16 -0.02 0.073 0.092 -0.1 -0.058 -0.12 0.029
self regulation survey: control 0.22 0.27 0.34 0.05 0.13 -0.003 -0.038 0.081 -0.065 -0.14 -0.29 0.043
time perspective survey: present fatalistic -0.008 -0.2 -0.29 -0.039 0.14 0.045 -0.095 -0.22 0.14 0.062 0.25 0.093
theories of willpower survey: endorse limited resource -0.053 -0.22 -0.27 0.084 0.088 -0.063 0.019 -0.21 0.094 0.2 -0.034 -0.063
sensation seeking survey: boredom susceptibility -0.09 -0.0056 0.01 -0.44 0.2 0.068 0.053 0.15 0.13 -0.046 0.064 -0.09
ten item personality survey: agreeableness 0.2 0.16 -0.071 0.43 0.13 0.077 -0.062 -0.13 -0.075 0.012 -0.056 0.11
time perspective survey: past positive 0.077 0.19 0.18 0.38 0.25 -0.039 -0.0014 -0.23 0.007 0.076 -0.012 -0.0018
erq survey: suppression -0.26 0.16 -0.094 -0.3 -0.3 0.24 -0.0049 -0.13 0.075 0.069 -0.24 0.088
bis bas survey: BAS fun seeking -0.061 0.025 -0.19 -0.035 0.62 0.27 0.074 0.068 0.0085 -0.0073 0.082 -0.028
time perspective survey: present hedonistic 0.026 0.049 -0.14 0.037 0.58 0.2 0.077 0.019 0.046 0.027 0.31 0.057
bis bas survey: BAS drive -0.032 0.15 0.39 -0.097 0.58 0.0087 0.062 -0.059 0.07 0.04 -0.032 0.001
bis bas survey: BAS reward responsiveness -0.045 -0.1 0.15 0.22 0.57 0.00034 -0.044 0.045 -0.089 0.09 -0.15 0.071
ten item personality survey: openness 0.072 0.045 -0.15 -0.091 0.48 0.12 0.061 0.26 -0.059 -0.18 -0.095 0.045
ten item personality survey: extraversion 0.19 0.26 0.11 0.066 0.32 -0.023 0.038 0.014 0.034 -0.023 0.28 0.043
sensation seeking survey: disinhibition 0.0057 -0.076 -0.066 -0.15 0.27 0.22 0.1 0.16 0.22 0.032 0.0061 -0.14
five facet mindfulness survey: observe 0.11 -0.2 0.074 0.13 0.26 -0.025 0.089 0.24 0.02 -0.12 -0.22 0.13
sensation seeking survey: thrill adventure seeking -0.015 -0.0017 0.054 -0.00055 -0.029 0.92 0.019 -0.015 -0.045 0.018 0.035 -0.037
impulsive venture survey: venturesomeness 0.065 0.0088 -0.024 -0.094 0.077 0.86 0.041 0.023 -0.066 -0.003 0.06 -0.034
dospert rt survey: recreational -0.045 0.012 0.053 0.055 -0.078 0.85 0.0052 0.051 0.071 -0.01 -0.02 -0.06
upps impulsivity survey: sensation seeking 0.035 0.042 -0.034 -0.11 0.2 0.81 0.051 -0.03 0.013 0.03 0.018 -0.026
dospert eb survey: recreational -0.079 -0.063 -0.0011 0.19 -0.068 0.73 0.019 0.13 0.18 -0.028 -0.029 0.071
dospert rt survey: financial 0.047 0.031 0.0086 -0.023 0.036 0.13 0.79 -0.025 -0.017 0.023 0.0024 0.068
dospert eb survey: financial -0.026 0.02 -0.035 0.023 -0.059 -0.041 0.67 0.062 0.21 0.1 -0.12 0.1
dospert rp survey: financial 0.05 0.033 -0.081 -0.039 0.0066 0.092 -0.6 0.026 0.16 0.028 -0.099 0.41
dospert rt survey: social -0.003 0.041 -0.0062 -0.084 0.035 0.034 0.016 0.78 -0.043 -0.0033 -0.0047 -0.054
dospert eb survey: social 0.0054 -0.0088 0.088 0.088 -0.12 0.083 -0.0081 0.6 0.23 0.057 0.035 0.16
sensation seeking survey: experience seeking 0.016 -0.0071 -0.17 -0.071 0.15 0.28 0.059 0.36 0.081 -0.012 -0.012 -0.036
dospert eb survey: ethical -0.074 0.078 -0.021 -0.017 -0.028 -0.00091 0.073 -0.025 0.64 0.096 -0.12 -0.12
dospert eb survey: health safety: logTr 0.015 0.0057 -0.0037 0.084 -0.013 0.079 0.11 0.03 0.64 -0.048 0.13 -0.099
dospert rt survey: ethical -0.067 -0.005 0.075 -0.24 -0.0026 -0.019 0.049 0.022 0.5 0.16 0.058 -0.2
dospert rt survey: health safety 0.043 -0.11 -0.0044 -0.08 0.069 0.1 0.02 0.19 0.49 0.014 0.11 -0.24
eating survey: uncontrolled eating -0.043 0.094 0.02 0.02 0.016 0.053 0.016 -0.031 0.051 0.87 -0.027 0.0067
eating survey: emotional eating 0.082 -0.081 -0.032 0.024 -0.043 -0.035 0.045 0.063 -0.075 0.83 -0.032 -0.003
upps impulsivity survey: lack of premeditation -0.058 0.1 0.0032 -0.056 -0.013 0.11 0.062 0.015 0.016 -0.049 0.8 -0.0096
bis11 survey: Nonplanning -0.12 -0.11 -0.28 0.058 -0.056 0.023 -0.063 -0.057 0.036 0.12 0.52 -0.054
bis11 survey: Motor: logTr -0.18 -0.088 -0.11 0.068 0.16 0.041 0.056 0.072 0.09 0.069 0.47 0.027
mpq control survey: control: ReflogTr -0.17 -0.034 -0.21 -0.069 0.15 0.1 0.01 0.2 -0.07 0.047 0.44 0.02
upps impulsivity survey: positive urgency -0.11 -0.13 0.11 -0.15 0.22 0.063 0.02 -0.11 0.17 0.22 0.43 -0.014
upps impulsivity survey: negative urgency -0.15 -0.38 0.049 -0.1 0.16 -0.013 -0.028 0.052 0.12 0.26 0.42 0.033
ten item personality survey: conscientiousness: ReflogTr -0.23 -0.11 -0.29 0.069 -0.1 -0.025 0.079 0.057 0.038 0.081 0.34 -0.019
dickman survey: functional 0.13 0.23 0.1 -0.2 0.23 0.16 0.11 0.09 -0.1 -0.045 0.24 0.044
dospert rp survey: health safety -0.0093 -0.017 0.043 0.00039 -0.00049 -0.044 -0.044 0.022 -0.21 0.054 -0.017 0.79
dospert rp survey: ethical 0.036 -0.044 0.035 0.12 0.00028 0.029 -0.059 0.021 -0.2 -0.05 0.087 0.72
dospert rp survey: recreational 0.0012 0.012 0.006 -0.083 0.034 -0.38 -0.036 0.052 0.079 -0.029 0.016 0.64
dospert rp survey: social -0.02 -0.11 -0.026 -0.012 0.022 -0.017 0.15 -0.34 0.3 -0.085 -0.043 0.54

Task Exploratory Factor Analysis Loadings

5 factors were determined using a BIC criteria for exploratory factor analysis. The 129 survey DVs are grouped and ordered based on the largest (absolute) factor loading for that DV. Dotted lines indicate separate groups derived from this criteria, and are used for visualization purposes only.

In [5]:
task_results = results['task']
plot_factor_df(task_results.EFA)
Out[5]:
Strategic IP Speeded IP Caution Perc / Resp Discounting
adaptive n back: mean load: logTr 0.61 0.24 0.064 -0.011 -0.0043
spatial span: forward span 0.56 -0.022 8.5e-05 -0.088 -0.043
spatial span: reverse span 0.55 0.039 0.067 -0.088 0.015
cognitive reflection survey: correct proportion 0.53 0.092 0.045 0.11 -0.22
tower of london: avg move time: logTr -0.5 0.15 0.14 0.3 -0.068
ravens: score 0.48 0.35 -0.05 0.061 -0.15
cognitive reflection survey: intuitive proportion -0.43 -0.056 -0.032 -0.069 0.11
columbia card task cold: information use 0.41 0.21 -0.024 -0.026 -0.12
adaptive n back: DDM-drift load 0.39 -0.11 0.13 0.024 -0.022
columbia card task hot: information use 0.39 0.14 -0.0072 -0.07 -0.026
columbia card task hot: loss-sensitivity: ReflogTr 0.37 0.032 0.025 -0.021 0.041
information sampling task: Fixed Win motivation 0.37 -0.26 -0.058 -0.29 0.11
two step decision: model based 0.35 0.25 0.048 0.087 -0.14
columbia card task hot: gain-sensitivity: logTr 0.35 -0.034 -0.065 -0.023 0.044
information sampling task: Fixed Win P correct 0.35 0.26 0.071 0.038 -0.008
columbia card task cold: gain-sensitivity: logTr 0.34 -0.031 -0.032 0.038 -0.04
angling risk task always sunny: keep adjusted clicks 0.33 -0.058 -0.076 -0.013 -0.049
digit span: reverse span 0.33 0.19 0.086 0.0076 -0.073
keep track: score 0.32 0.15 0.0048 -0.083 -0.066
adaptive n back: DDM-thresh 0.31 -0.07 0.18 0.14 -0.0055
digit span: forward span 0.29 0.15 0.063 0.016 -0.058
tower of london: num optimal solutions 0.29 0.13 -0.0041 0.02 -0.072
columbia card task hot: probability-sensitivity -0.29 -0.059 -0.0015 0.12 -0.0096
columbia card task cold: loss-sensitivity -0.28 -0.043 -0.028 0.021 0.089
two step decision: model free -0.27 0.11 0.059 -0.056 0.029
shift task: learning rate 0.27 0.18 -0.013 -0.044 -0.096
shift task: acc 0.27 0.21 0.017 -0.084 -0.093
angling risk task always sunny: release adjusted clicks 0.26 0.014 -0.16 0.033 0.0031
tower of london: planning time -0.25 0.13 0.19 0.18 -0.066
tower of london: num extra moves 0.23 -0.19 -0.16 -0.18 0.16
columbia card task cold: probability-sensitivity -0.14 -0.14 0.1 -0.012 0.031
writing task: neutral probability -0.13 0.032 0.083 -0.013 -0.07
holt laury survey: risk aversion -0.11 0.026 -0.062 0.016 0.063
holt laury survey: safe choices -0.1 0.076 -0.03 0.074 0.1
holt laury survey: beta: logTr -0.098 0.078 -0.051 0.027 -0.02
writing task: positive probability -0.089 0.045 0.084 0.052 -0.068
probabilistic selection: positive learning bias 0.074 0.0083 0.027 -0.064 -0.0024
choice reaction time: DDM-drift -0.093 0.76 -0.054 0.0034 0.026
dot pattern expectancy: DDM-drift 0.18 0.7 -0.11 0.052 0.0087
simon: DDM-drift 0.014 0.66 0.086 -0.022 0.039
shape matching: DDM-drift 0.016 0.65 0.038 -0.0092 -0.0036
directed forgetting: DDM-drift 0.18 0.65 -0.073 -0.026 -0.0051
dot pattern expectancy: dprime 0.11 0.64 -0.076 0.046 -0.015
stop signal: DDM-drift -0.045 0.64 0.23 -0.064 0.021
cue/task switch: DDM-drift 0.16 0.62 0.042 -0.064 -0.13
stim selective stop signal: DDM-drift 0.033 0.6 0.17 -0.037 -0.043
motor selective stop signal: DDM-drift -0.06 0.59 0.26 -0.12 -0.01
recent probes: DDM-drift 0.19 0.59 -0.11 -0.03 -0.019
go nogo: dprime -0.042 0.54 0.19 -0.026 0.039
stroop: DDM-drift -0.047 0.51 0.2 -0.1 -0.036
cue/task switch: DDM-non-decision 0.12 0.46 -0.12 0.11 -0.03
shape matching: stimulus interference DDM-drift 0.12 -0.46 0.21 0.036 -0.057
attention network task: DDM-drift 0.098 0.43 0.32 0.0076 0.063
stim selective stop signal: reactive control DDM-drift 0.029 -0.42 0.17 -0.22 0.11
simon: simon DDM-drift 0.2 -0.4 0.29 0.045 0.021
dot pattern expectancy: bias 0.033 0.39 -0.17 0.13 -0.044
local global letter: DDM-drift 0.32 0.37 -0.0029 -0.1 -0.055
hierarchical rule: score 0.24 0.35 0.0071 -0.065 -0.11
attention network task: orienting DDM-drift -0.12 -0.34 0.069 0.078 -0.034
two step decision: perseverance 0.18 0.33 0.079 0.095 -0.11
motor selective stop signal: proactive control DDM-drift 0.022 -0.33 -0.044 0.21 0.043
adaptive n back: DDM-non-decision -0.029 0.32 0.013 0.12 -0.0026
adaptive n back: DDM-drift 0.032 0.32 -0.15 -0.047 0.068
information sampling task: Decreasing Win motivation 0.25 -0.3 -0.021 -0.28 0.084
dot pattern expectancy: DDM-thresh: logTr 0.22 0.26 0.19 0.099 0.038
dot pattern expectancy: DDM-non-decision -0.21 0.25 0.01 0.16 0.035
dietary decision: taste-sensitivity 0.13 0.25 0.024 -0.023 -0.041
dot pattern expectancy: AY-BY DDM-drift -0.085 -0.24 0.15 -0.065 0.0076
attention network task: alerting DDM-drift -0.19 -0.23 0.086 0.025 -0.043
angling risk task always sunny: keep coef of variation 0.027 -0.22 0.0047 0.036 0.049
dot pattern expectancy: BX-BY DDM-drift -0.0096 0.22 -0.065 0.057 -0.039
stop signal: proactive slowing DDM-thresh -0.16 0.21 0.063 -0.028 -0.06
shift task: model decay: ReflogTr -0.0093 -0.21 -0.039 0.046 -0.11
shift task: model learning rate 0.04 0.19 -0.042 -0.13 -0.0097
cue/task switch: cue switch-cost DDM-drift -0.055 -0.18 0.012 -0.029 -0.019
directed forgetting: proactive interference DDM-drift: logTr 0.071 0.18 0.0047 -0.01 -0.028
recent probes: proactive interference DDM-drift 0.048 -0.18 0.065 0.047 0.0087
local global letter: switch-cost DDM-drift -0.06 -0.18 0.063 -0.16 0.019
information sampling task: Decreasing Win P correct 0.057 0.16 0.093 0.085 0.014
stroop: stroop DDM-drift 0.067 -0.16 0.14 -0.016 -0.089
cue/task switch: task switch-cost DDM-drift -0.089 -0.16 0.1 0.068 0.025
local global letter: global bias DDM-drift 0.016 0.15 0.037 -0.025 0.043
columbia card task cold: avg cards chosen -0.11 -0.13 -0.072 -0.072 0.019
shift task: learning to learn -0.03 0.13 0.0073 -0.016 0.014
angling risk task always sunny: release coef of variation: logTr 0.0055 -0.1 -0.1 0.015 0.059
shape matching: DDM-thresh: logTr 0.085 -0.058 0.59 0.0044 -0.023
simon: DDM-thresh 0.0045 -0.15 0.56 0.16 -0.037
attention network task: DDM-thresh 0.022 0.072 0.54 0.063 0.08
cue/task switch: DDM-thresh: logTr 0.047 -0.18 0.53 0.12 -0.059
motor selective stop signal: DDM-thresh: logTr -0.11 0.18 0.51 -0.1 -0.0098
stim selective stop signal: DDM-thresh: logTr -0.079 0.2 0.5 -0.18 0.02
stroop: DDM-thresh: logTr -0.12 0.05 0.49 -0.055 -0.12
local global letter: DDM-thresh 0.25 0.029 0.48 0.097 0.025
choice reaction time: DDM-thresh 0.035 -0.0019 0.45 0.1 0.068
stop signal: DDM-thresh: logTr -0.21 0.17 0.44 -0.13 0.036
recent probes: DDM-thresh 0.12 -0.15 0.4 0.034 -0.0048
directed forgetting: DDM-thresh 0.21 0.0076 0.4 0.041 -0.091
go nogo: bias -0.067 -0.05 0.38 0.035 0.065
psychological refractory period two choices: PRP slope -0.15 -0.13 0.3 0.28 -0.035
local global letter: conflict DDM-drift 0.063 0.052 0.27 0.13 0.0065
attention network task: conflict DDM-drift: ReflogTr -0.043 0.15 -0.16 0.02 -0.029
stop signal: proactive slowing DDM-drift -0.034 0.0076 -0.055 -0.014 -0.011
motor selective stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr 0.01 -0.016 0.091 -0.57 -0.071
stop signal: SSRT low -0.011 -0.23 -0.056 0.56 0.012
attention network task: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr 0.15 -0.08 0.082 -0.55 0.035
simon: DDM-non-decision -0.0007 0.058 0.1 0.54 0.098
stop signal: SSRT high: logTr 0.0071 -0.23 -0.06 0.54 -0.0017
motor selective stop signal: SSRT 0.048 -0.21 -0.12 0.51 -0.012
stim selective stop signal: SSRT -0.032 -0.23 -0.18 0.5 -0.048
shape matching: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr 0.11 -0.11 -0.19 -0.5 -0.046
choice reaction time: DDM-non-decision: logTr 0.02 0.013 0.093 0.49 0.041
stroop: DDM-non-decision -0.015 0.068 0.13 0.49 0.13
stim selective stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr -0.044 -0.094 0.024 -0.49 -0.014
stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr -0.075 -0.1 -0.11 -0.46 -0.08
simple reaction time: avg rt: logTr 0.032 -0.42 0.16 0.45 0.058
recent probes: DDM-non-decision -0.03 0.1 0.21 0.44 -0.066
directed forgetting: DDM-non-decision -0.093 0.26 0.068 0.42 -0.047
local global letter: DDM-non-decision 0.061 0.19 0.19 0.38 -0.034
motor selective stop signal: reactive control DDM-drift 0.023 -0.11 0.046 -0.15 0.041
shift task: model beta: logTr 0.086 -0.042 0.062 0.12 -0.017
stop signal: proactive SSRT speeding -0.0068 -0.049 -0.036 0.11 0.01
columbia card task hot: avg cards chosen -0.04 -0.086 -0.075 -0.099 0.035
kirby: hyp discount rate large: logTr 0.042 -0.014 -0.031 0.0083 0.9
kirby: hyp discount rate small: logTr 0.044 -0.035 0.022 -0.016 0.89
bickel titrator: hyp discount rate medium: logTr -0.041 0.1 -0.026 0.037 0.75
discount titrate: percent patient 0.01 0.03 -0.045 -0.049 -0.7
bickel titrator: hyp discount rate small: logTr -0.082 0.06 0.041 -0.037 0.68
bickel titrator: hyp discount rate large: logTr -0.066 0.1 -0.047 0.079 0.62
dietary decision: health-sensitivity -0.06 -0.086 0.029 -0.01 -0.12

Outcome Exploratory Factor Analysis Loadings

9 factors were determined using a BIC criteria for exploratory factor analysis. The 55 target measures are grouped and ordered based on the largest (absolute) factor loading for that target measure. Dotted lines indicate separate groups derived from this criteria, and are used for visualization purposes only.

In [6]:
plot_factor_df(task_results.DA)
Out[6]:
Binge Drinking Problem Drinking Lifetime Smoking Daily Smoking Drug Use Mental Health Obesity Income / Life Milestones
AlcoholHowOften6Drinks 0.87 0.064 0.028 0.039 0.011 0.022 0.024 -0.012
AlcoholHowOften 0.62 0.057 -0.016 0.051 0.038 -0.029 -0.084 0.23
AlcoholHowManyDrinksDay 0.6 0.13 0.14 0.004 -0.036 0.003 0.091 -0.12
DivorceCount -0.17 0.042 0.1 -0.0016 -0.031 0.0098 -0.031 -0.09
HowOftenDrinkMorning -0.16 0.85 0.0015 0.034 0.049 0.014 0.023 0.047
HowOftenFailedActivitiesDrinking -0.0026 0.84 0.049 -0.038 -0.035 -0.025 -0.032 -0.011
HowOftenCantStopDrinking 0.14 0.79 0.0021 0.014 -0.028 0.0033 -0.0054 0.0053
HowOftenGuiltRemorseDrinking 0.19 0.7 -0.09 0.046 0.031 0.02 0.0011 -0.056
HowOftenUnableRememberDrinking 0.24 0.55 0.0015 -0.047 0.025 -0.0046 -0.028 -0.073
RelativeFriendConcernedDrinking 0.13 0.34 0.19 -0.019 0.29 0.086 0.047 0.062
InjuredDrinking 0.14 0.24 0.17 -0.031 0.24 0.085 0.08 0.11
LifetimeSmoke100Cigs 0.0075 -0.012 0.97 -0.026 0.017 0.0094 -0.015 0.019
HowLongSmoked 0.022 0.014 0.77 0.21 -0.016 -0.0048 0.0024 -0.047
RelationshipNumber 0.17 -0.056 0.26 -0.054 0.067 -0.069 -0.13 0.004
TrafficAccidentsLifeCount 0.035 0.037 0.15 -0.02 0.038 0.06 0.074 0.14
CigsPerDay -0.022 -0.012 -0.04 0.94 0.016 0.015 0.0024 -0.032
SmokeEveryDay 0.01 -0.01 0.1 0.92 0.008 0.0026 -0.0019 -0.006
HowSoonSmokeAfterWaking 0.082 0.06 0.011 0.72 -0.021 -0.032 -0.028 0.046
CoffeeCupsPerDay 0.079 -0.11 0.028 0.2 0.16 0.043 -0.00011 0.017
TrafficTicketsLastYearCount 0.013 0.038 -0.055 0.14 0.12 0.093 0.056 0.084
NeglectedFamilyDrugUse -0.08 0.02 0.013 0.017 0.78 -0.018 0.025 0.044
WidthdrawalSymptoms -0.0027 -0.00096 0.066 -0.051 0.75 0.011 -0.036 -0.022
EngagedInIllegalActsToObtainDrugs 0.11 -0.092 -0.023 0.051 0.74 -0.01 -0.01 -0.04
SpouseParentsComplainDrugUse 0.036 0.014 -0.078 -0.022 0.73 0.0055 -0.047 0.043
BlackoutFlashbackDrugUse -0.05 0.049 0.019 0.056 0.73 0.0072 -0.014 -0.011
FeelBadGuiltyDrugUse -0.0008 0.014 0.031 -0.00047 0.7 0.025 0.015 -0.062
AbuseMoreThanOneDrugAtATime 0.051 0.024 -0.0032 -0.061 0.67 -0.035 0.018 -0.056
MedicalProblemsDueToDrugUse -0.062 -0.043 -0.018 0.038 0.66 0.013 0.03 0.056
GamblingProblem -0.038 0.15 -0.0081 0.086 0.28 0.055 0.037 -0.0014
AbleToStopDrugs 0.15 -0.2 0.068 0.00088 -0.21 -0.0098 0.048 0.023
ArrestedChargedLifeCount -0.0087 0.18 0.17 0.042 0.18 0.029 0.032 -0.094
CannabisPast6Months 0.13 -0.069 0.12 0.061 0.16 -0.028 -0.018 -0.096
CaffieneOtherSourcesDayMG -0.093 0.0078 0.074 -0.062 0.11 0.0069 -0.016 0.088
Depressed -0.019 0.02 0.00037 -0.016 0.0092 0.92 0.0025 0.047
Hopeless 0.046 -0.073 -0.0059 0.00098 0.018 0.89 -0.0013 -0.048
Worthless -0.0055 0.016 0.022 0.018 -0.012 0.88 -0.017 0.025
EverythingIsEffort -0.046 0.056 0.036 -0.024 -0.046 0.82 0.016 -0.00069
Nervous -0.011 -0.024 -0.065 0.05 0.02 0.69 -0.024 -0.018
RestlessFidgety 0.055 -0.002 -0.0077 -0.028 0.011 0.65 0.03 -0.062
Last30DaysUsual 0.022 -0.041 -0.12 0.086 -0.018 0.36 0.0089 -0.0057
RelationshipStatus 0.043 0.0097 0.072 -0.024 -0.049 -0.15 0.032 0.11
Obese -0.026 0.035 -0.037 0.041 -0.0076 0.0036 0.94 0.021
BMI 0.059 -0.064 0.027 -0.064 0.00094 -0.0071 0.86 -0.0088
leisure time activity survey: activity level 0.17 -0.093 -0.058 0.0011 -0.032 -0.012 -0.26 0.19
CaffienatedSodaCansPerDay -0.12 0.0026 0.024 0.093 0.045 0.027 0.14 -0.099
TeaCupsPerDay 0.031 -0.068 0.061 -0.064 0.051 -0.051 0.097 -0.083
HouseholdIncome 0.035 -0.023 -0.00083 -0.036 -0.026 -0.012 0.014 0.71
RetirementAccount 0.0018 0.021 0.00035 -0.021 -0.0043 -0.028 0.026 0.56
HighestEducation 0.14 -0.014 -0.033 -0.034 0.021 0.024 -0.13 0.31
RentOwn -0.11 0.028 -0.054 0.068 0.0029 -0.029 -0.019 0.29
ChildrenNumber -0.11 -0.013 0.06 0.18 -0.05 -0.073 0.08 0.25
LongestRelationship -0.039 -0.0084 0.051 0.067 -0.051 -0.068 0.065 0.24

Factor Robustness Analyses

Factor robustness proceeded in two ways:

(1) By dropping one measure at a time, recalculating the survey factor solution (with the same number of factors as the full sample) and correlating the new factor loadings with the original factor loadings. This correlation is calculated on all DVs excepting those dropped out because of the dropped measure. Tables for these correlations are shown with values below .9 highlighted in red

(2) By using a bootstrap procedure (see fa.sapa), which creates confidence intervals for each loading. 95% confidence intervals are plotted as bar plots for each loading

Survey Robustness

Measurement Drop

Individual surveys sometimes had large effects on the factor structure, likely because of spare measurement of highly discriminat psychological constructs. All dimensions that are affected by a measure drop out (correlation pre-post drop out of factor loadings < .9) are highlighted. Worse deviation are colored darker.

In [7]:
f = path.join(results['survey'].get_output_dir(), 'EFAdrop_robustness.pkl')
survey_EFA_robustness = pickle.load(open(f, 'rb'))
plot_EFA_robustness(survey_EFA_robustness)
Out[7]:
Agreeableness Eating Control Emotional Control Ethical Risk-Taking Financial Risk-Taking Goal-Directedness Impulsivity Mindfulness Reward Sensitivity Risk Perception Sensation Seeking Social Risk-Taking
bis11 survey 0.993 0.999 1 0.999 0.999 0.998 0.995 0.998 0.998 1 1 0.999
bis bas survey 0.86 0.986 0.964 0.993 0.998 0.982 0.993 0.995 0.927 0.993 0.998 0.986
brief self control survey 0.999 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
dickman survey 0.995 1 0.999 0.999 1 0.999 1 1 0.999 1 1 1
dospert eb survey 0.894 0.98 0.954 0.506 0.401 0.836 0.983 0.993 0.869 0.945 0.991 0.723
dospert rp survey 0.943 0.982 0.948 0.925 0.46 0.841 0.984 0.995 0.839 0.512 0.989 0.968
dospert rt survey 0.918 0.985 0.948 0.912 0.506 0.868 0.976 0.995 0.868 0.984 0.99 0.808
eating survey 0.958 0.538 0.993 0.997 0.992 0.851 0.997 0.995 0.799 0.997 0.998 0.982
erq survey 0.991 0.999 0.998 0.999 0.999 0.999 0.997 0.999 0.993 0.999 0.999 0.999
five facet mindfulness survey 0.867 0.992 0.825 0.996 0.996 0.847 0.99 0.715 0.995 0.996 0.996 0.99
future time perspective survey 0.994 1 0.999 0.999 1 0.999 1 0.998 1 1 1 1
grit scale survey 0.998 1 0.999 1 0.999 0.991 0.992 0.998 0.995 1 0.999 1
impulsive venture survey 0.994 1 1 0.998 0.999 0.999 0.999 0.999 0.994 1 0.996 1
mindful attention awareness survey 0.965 0.995 0.964 0.993 0.996 0.797 0.979 0.783 0.978 0.996 0.997 0.992
mpq control survey 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.999
selection optimization compensation survey 0.956 0.995 0.994 0.999 0.998 0.927 0.975 0.999 0.891 0.999 0.999 0.998
self regulation survey 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
sensation seeking survey 0.965 0.999 0.996 0.997 0.999 0.998 0.998 0.999 0.998 0.999 0.997 0.99
ten item personality survey 0.763 0.994 0.899 0.997 0.998 0.982 0.996 0.997 0.99 0.998 0.998 0.996
theories of willpower survey 1 1 1 1 1 0.999 1 1 1 1 1 1
time perspective survey 0.935 0.992 0.994 0.993 0.996 0.959 0.994 0.995 0.985 0.997 0.997 0.994
upps impulsivity survey 0.984 0.989 0.996 0.999 0.997 0.853 0.898 0.995 0.969 0.998 0.998 0.996

Bootstrap

It's clear that loadings are robust to the particulars of the sample. The standard deviation of the loadings are very small relative to the mean loadings.

In [8]:
plot_bootstrap_results(survey_results.EFA.get_boot_stats())
# of components not specified, using BIC determined #

Task Robustness

Measurement Drop

Task factors are more robust to dropping out particular measures, likely due to the greater overlap in the psychological constructs measured by individual tasks

In [9]:
f = path.join(results['task'].get_output_dir(), 'EFAdrop_robustness.pkl')
task_EFA_robustness = pickle.load(open(f, 'rb'))
plot_EFA_robustness(task_EFA_robustness)
Out[9]:
Caution Discounting Perc / Resp Speeded IP Strategic IP
adaptive n back 0.998 1 1 0.998 0.995
angling risk task always sunny 1 1 1 1 0.999
attention network task 0.996 1 0.999 1 0.999
bickel titrator 1 0.997 1 0.999 1
choice reaction time 0.999 1 0.999 0.999 0.998
cognitive reflection survey 1 0.999 0.999 0.999 0.997
columbia card task cold 1 1 1 0.999 0.997
columbia card task hot 1 1 1 0.999 0.996
dietary decision 1 1 1 1 1
digit span 1 1 1 1 0.999
directed forgetting 0.999 1 0.999 0.999 0.999
discount titrate 1 0.999 1 1 1
dot pattern expectancy 0.995 1 0.998 0.997 0.996
go nogo 0.999 1 1 1 1
hierarchical rule 1 1 1 1 1
holt laury survey 1 1 1 1 1
information sampling task 0.999 0.999 0.998 0.998 0.998
keep track 1 1 1 1 1
kirby 0.995 0.557 0.945 0.975 0.868
local global letter 0.999 1 1 1 0.999
motor selective stop signal 0.995 1 0.996 0.999 0.999
probabilistic selection 1 1 1 1 1
psychological refractory period two choices 1 1 1 1 1
ravens 1 1 0.999 0.999 0.998
recent probes 0.999 1 0.999 1 1
shape matching 0.997 1 0.999 0.998 0.999
shift task 1 1 1 1 1
simon 0.997 1 0.999 0.998 0.999
simple reaction time 0.999 1 0.999 0.999 0.999
spatial span 1 1 0.999 0.999 0.996
stim selective stop signal 0.997 1 0.998 0.999 1
stop signal 0.957 0.998 0.954 0.987 0.979
stroop 0.999 1 0.998 1 0.999
threebytwo 0.996 1 0.999 0.998 1
tower of london 0.999 0.998 0.998 0.995 0.994
two stage decision 1 1 1 1 1
writing task 1 1 1 1 1

Bootstrap

It's clear that loadings are robust to the particulars of the sample. The standard deviation of the loadings are very small relative to the mean loadings.

In [10]:
plot_bootstrap_results(task_results.EFA.get_boot_stats())
# of components not specified, using BIC determined #

Hierarchical Clustering

Hierarchical clustering was used to order dependent variables based on the similarity of their loading vectors. This resulted in a dendrogram, which was subset into clusters using the DynamicTreeCut algorithm. These clusters are separately plotted below, allowing the constituent DVs to be read.

Survey Clusters

Below is the survey dendrogram (reproduced from the main manuscript). Following are the 12 clusters. separately plotted. The fourth and fifth clusters, referenced in the main text, together reflect canonical components of "self-control".

In [11]:
_ = plot_results_dendrogram(survey_results, size=20, drop_list=[0,2,4,6,8,10])
In [12]:
plot_subbranches(survey_results, size=6)
# of components not specified, using BIC determined #
Out[12]:
[<Figure size 432x864 with 5 Axes>,
 <Figure size 432x864 with 5 Axes>,
 <Figure size 432x864 with 5 Axes>,
 <Figure size 432x864 with 5 Axes>,
 <Figure size 432x864 with 5 Axes>,
 <Figure size 432x864 with 5 Axes>,
 <Figure size 432x864 with 5 Axes>,
 <Figure size 432x864 with 5 Axes>,
 <Figure size 432x864 with 5 Axes>,
 <Figure size 432x864 with 5 Axes>,
 <Figure size 432x864 with 5 Axes>,
 <Figure size 432x864 with 5 Axes>]

Task Clusters

Below is the task dendrogram (reproduced from the main manuscript). Following are the 15 of the 16 clusers separately plotted. One cluster composed of a single DV (towards the center of the dendrogram) is not plotted. The single DV is the "Positive Learning Bias" from the "Probabilistic Selection Task"

In [13]:
_ = plot_results_dendrogram(task_results, size=20, drop_list=[1,5,9,12,15], double_drop_list=[2,4,6,8,14])
In [14]:
plot_subbranches(task_results, size=6)
# of components not specified, using BIC determined #
Out[14]:
[<Figure size 432x864 with 5 Axes>,
 <Figure size 432x864 with 5 Axes>,
 <Figure size 432x864 with 5 Axes>,
 <Figure size 432x864 with 5 Axes>,
 <Figure size 432x864 with 5 Axes>,
 <Figure size 432x864 with 5 Axes>,
 <Figure size 432x864 with 5 Axes>,
 <Figure size 432x864 with 5 Axes>,
 <Figure size 432x864 with 5 Axes>,
 <Figure size 432x864 with 5 Axes>,
 <Figure size 432x864 with 5 Axes>,
 <Figure size 432x864 with 5 Axes>,
 <Figure size 432x864 with 5 Axes>,
 <Figure size 432x864 with 5 Axes>,
 <Figure size 432x864 with 5 Axes>]

Cluster Robustness Analyses

Clustering was repeated 5000 times with perturbed loading matrices. First, each simulation used only 80% of the total DVs. Second, each loading value was sampling from a gaussian with mean and standard deviation determined by the EFA bootstrap method. Finally, the same clustering approach described in the main paper is applied (hierarchical clustering followed by dynamicTreeCut).

Each simulation produces a co-occurence matrix: 1 if two variables were clustered together, and 0 otherwise. Averaged over simulations this produces a more robust estimate of the probability two DVs should be clustered (ranging from 0% to 100%). 1-P(clustering together) is then used as a distance matrix to perform one final clustering which creates a "consensus cluster".

We provide plots to show three aspects of the clustering:

  • The AMI values when comparing the original clustering to simulations or the consensus clustering
  • The list of DVs that are most often clustered with each DV (i.e., closest DVs to each DV according to the consensus clustering
  • The closest variables contained in the same cluster according to the original clustering solution above

Survey Cluster Robustness

AMI values

In [15]:
f = path.join(results['survey'].get_output_dir(), 'cluster_robustness.pkl')
survey_cluster_robustness = pickle.load(open(f, 'rb'))
survey_consensus = survey_cluster_robustness['consensusClust']
plot_HCA_AMI(survey_consensus)
/media/Data/Ian/miniconda/envs/SO/lib/python3.5/site-packages/sklearn/metrics/cluster/supervised.py:732: FutureWarning: The behavior of AMI will change in version 0.22. To match the behavior of 'v_measure_score', AMI will use average_method='arithmetic' by default.
  FutureWarning)

Closest values according to consensus clustering

Hover over each cell to bold the DV. Columns are organized by first closest DV to eighth closest DV. Each cell contains a DV name and the percent of simulations it was clustered with the DV defining the row.

In [16]:
display_closest_DVs(survey_consensus, n_closest=8)
Out[16]:
first second third fourth fifth sixth seventh eigth
bis11 survey: Attentional five facet mindfulness survey: act with awareness: 100% mindful attention awareness survey: mindfulness: 100% five facet mindfulness survey: describe: 93% grit scale survey: grit: 8% selection optimization compensation survey: elective selection: 4% erq survey: suppression: 4% brief self control survey: self control: 4% self regulation survey: control: 3%
bis11 survey: Motor: logTr mpq control survey: control: ReflogTr: 100% bis11 survey: Nonplanning: 100% ten item personality survey: conscientiousness: ReflogTr: 99% upps impulsivity survey: lack of perseverance: 98% self regulation survey: control: 98% upps impulsivity survey: lack of premeditation: 97% time perspective survey: future: 95% brief self control survey: self control: 77%
bis11 survey: Nonplanning mpq control survey: control: ReflogTr: 100% bis11 survey: Motor: logTr: 100% ten item personality survey: conscientiousness: ReflogTr: 99% self regulation survey: control: 99% upps impulsivity survey: lack of perseverance: 99% upps impulsivity survey: lack of premeditation: 98% time perspective survey: future: 97% brief self control survey: self control: 74%
bis bas survey: BAS drive bis bas survey: BAS reward responsiveness: 98% five facet mindfulness survey: observe: 57% bis bas survey: BAS fun seeking: 49% time perspective survey: present hedonistic: 49% eating survey: cognitive restraint: 48% ten item personality survey: openness: 47% dickman survey: functional: 39% ten item personality survey: extraversion: 34%
bis bas survey: BAS fun seeking time perspective survey: present hedonistic: 100% ten item personality survey: openness: 99% sensation seeking survey: disinhibition: 71% sensation seeking survey: experience seeking: 60% dickman survey: functional: 52% bis bas survey: BAS drive: 49% bis bas survey: BAS reward responsiveness: 41% ten item personality survey: extraversion: 37%
bis bas survey: BAS reward responsiveness bis bas survey: BAS drive: 98% five facet mindfulness survey: observe: 74% eating survey: cognitive restraint: 62% bis bas survey: BAS fun seeking: 41% time perspective survey: present hedonistic: 40% ten item personality survey: openness: 40% dickman survey: functional: 24% ten item personality survey: extraversion: 20%
bis bas survey: BIS ten item personality survey: emotional stability: 99% time perspective survey: past negative: 99% five facet mindfulness survey: nonjudge: 98% future time perspective survey: future time perspective: 90% five facet mindfulness survey: nonreact: 85% erq survey: reappraisal: 85% ten item personality survey: extraversion: 27% dickman survey: functional: 19%
brief self control survey: self control self regulation survey: control: 80% bis11 survey: Motor: logTr: 77% ten item personality survey: conscientiousness: ReflogTr: 77% mpq control survey: control: ReflogTr: 76% upps impulsivity survey: lack of perseverance: 75% bis11 survey: Nonplanning: 74% upps impulsivity survey: lack of premeditation: 72% upps impulsivity survey: positive urgency: 71%
dickman survey: functional ten item personality survey: extraversion: 91% time perspective survey: present hedonistic: 58% bis bas survey: BAS fun seeking: 52% ten item personality survey: openness: 52% bis bas survey: BAS drive: 39% eating survey: emotional eating: 30% sensation seeking survey: disinhibition: 29% eating survey: uncontrolled eating: 24%
dospert eb survey: ethical dospert rt survey: ethical: 100% dospert eb survey: health safety: logTr: 100% dospert rt survey: health safety: 99% dospert rp survey: ethical: 24% dospert rp survey: health safety: 23% dospert rp survey: social: 13% ten item personality survey: agreeableness: 11% dospert rp survey: recreational: 11%
dospert eb survey: financial dospert rp survey: financial: 100% dospert rt survey: financial: 100% eating survey: uncontrolled eating: 13% eating survey: emotional eating: 12% dospert rp survey: social: 11% dospert rp survey: recreational: 6% dospert rp survey: ethical: 5% dospert rp survey: health safety: 5%
dospert eb survey: health safety: logTr dospert rt survey: ethical: 100% dospert eb survey: ethical: 100% dospert rt survey: health safety: 99% dospert rp survey: ethical: 25% dospert rp survey: health safety: 24% dospert rp survey: social: 14% dospert rp survey: recreational: 12% ten item personality survey: agreeableness: 10%
dospert eb survey: recreational upps impulsivity survey: sensation seeking: 100% impulsive venture survey: venturesomeness: 100% dospert rt survey: recreational: 100% sensation seeking survey: thrill adventure seeking: 100% erq survey: suppression: 89% ten item personality survey: extraversion: 10% five facet mindfulness survey: describe: 6% dospert rp survey: recreational: 3%
dospert eb survey: social dospert rt survey: social: 100% time perspective survey: past positive: 90% ten item personality survey: agreeableness: 68% sensation seeking survey: boredom susceptibility: 41% sensation seeking survey: experience seeking: 37% sensation seeking survey: disinhibition: 17% dickman survey: functional: 13% ten item personality survey: extraversion: 13%
dospert rp survey: ethical dospert rp survey: recreational: 100% dospert rp survey: health safety: 100% dospert rp survey: social: 88% dospert eb survey: health safety: logTr: 25% dospert rt survey: health safety: 24% dospert eb survey: ethical: 24% dospert rt survey: ethical: 22% dospert rp survey: financial: 11%
dospert rp survey: financial dospert rt survey: financial: 100% dospert eb survey: financial: 100% dospert rp survey: social: 17% dospert rp survey: recreational: 12% dospert rp survey: health safety: 11% dospert rp survey: ethical: 11% eating survey: uncontrolled eating: 10% eating survey: emotional eating: 10%
dospert rp survey: health safety dospert rp survey: recreational: 100% dospert rp survey: ethical: 100% dospert rp survey: social: 90% dospert eb survey: health safety: logTr: 24% dospert rt survey: health safety: 23% dospert eb survey: ethical: 23% dospert rt survey: ethical: 21% dospert rp survey: financial: 11%
dospert rp survey: recreational dospert rp survey: health safety: 100% dospert rp survey: ethical: 100% dospert rp survey: social: 96% dospert rp survey: financial: 12% dospert eb survey: health safety: logTr: 12% dospert eb survey: ethical: 11% dospert rt survey: health safety: 10% dospert rt survey: ethical: 9%
dospert rp survey: social dospert rp survey: recreational: 96% dospert rp survey: health safety: 90% dospert rp survey: ethical: 88% dospert rp survey: financial: 17% dospert eb survey: health safety: logTr: 14% dospert eb survey: ethical: 13% dospert rt survey: health safety: 12% dospert eb survey: financial: 11%
dospert rt survey: ethical dospert eb survey: ethical: 100% dospert eb survey: health safety: logTr: 100% dospert rt survey: health safety: 99% dospert rp survey: ethical: 22% dospert rp survey: health safety: 21% ten item personality survey: agreeableness: 15% sensation seeking survey: boredom susceptibility: 14% dospert rp survey: social: 10%
dospert rt survey: financial dospert rp survey: financial: 100% dospert eb survey: financial: 100% eating survey: uncontrolled eating: 15% eating survey: emotional eating: 14% dospert rp survey: social: 10% dospert rp survey: recreational: 4% dospert rp survey: health safety: 4% dospert rp survey: ethical: 4%
dospert rt survey: health safety dospert rt survey: ethical: 99% dospert eb survey: ethical: 99% dospert eb survey: health safety: logTr: 99% dospert rp survey: ethical: 24% dospert rp survey: health safety: 23% ten item personality survey: agreeableness: 14% sensation seeking survey: boredom susceptibility: 13% dospert rp survey: social: 12%
dospert rt survey: recreational upps impulsivity survey: sensation seeking: 100% sensation seeking survey: thrill adventure seeking: 100% impulsive venture survey: venturesomeness: 100% dospert eb survey: recreational: 100% erq survey: suppression: 90% ten item personality survey: extraversion: 10% five facet mindfulness survey: describe: 6% dospert rp survey: recreational: 3%
dospert rt survey: social dospert eb survey: social: 100% time perspective survey: past positive: 87% ten item personality survey: agreeableness: 68% sensation seeking survey: boredom susceptibility: 45% sensation seeking survey: experience seeking: 43% sensation seeking survey: disinhibition: 19% ten item personality survey: openness: 11% dospert rp survey: social: 10%
eating survey: cognitive restraint five facet mindfulness survey: observe: 99% bis bas survey: BAS reward responsiveness: 62% bis bas survey: BAS drive: 48% eating survey: uncontrolled eating: 34% eating survey: emotional eating: 27% five facet mindfulness survey: nonjudge: 14% bis bas survey: BIS: 13% ten item personality survey: emotional stability: 12%
eating survey: emotional eating eating survey: uncontrolled eating: 100% dickman survey: functional: 30% ten item personality survey: extraversion: 29% eating survey: cognitive restraint: 27% five facet mindfulness survey: observe: 24% theories of willpower survey: endorse limited resource: 18% dospert rt survey: financial: 14% dospert eb survey: financial: 12%
eating survey: uncontrolled eating eating survey: emotional eating: 100% eating survey: cognitive restraint: 34% five facet mindfulness survey: observe: 30% dickman survey: functional: 24% ten item personality survey: extraversion: 22% theories of willpower survey: endorse limited resource: 18% dospert rt survey: financial: 15% dospert eb survey: financial: 13%
erq survey: reappraisal future time perspective survey: future time perspective: 100% five facet mindfulness survey: nonreact: 97% ten item personality survey: emotional stability: 92% time perspective survey: past negative: 88% bis bas survey: BIS: 85% five facet mindfulness survey: nonjudge: 84% upps impulsivity survey: negative urgency: 32% upps impulsivity survey: positive urgency: 25%
erq survey: suppression dospert rt survey: recreational: 90% sensation seeking survey: thrill adventure seeking: 89% dospert eb survey: recreational: 89% upps impulsivity survey: sensation seeking: 88% impulsive venture survey: venturesomeness: 88% five facet mindfulness survey: describe: 19% ten item personality survey: extraversion: 13% mindful attention awareness survey: mindfulness: 10%
five facet mindfulness survey: act with awareness bis11 survey: Attentional: 100% mindful attention awareness survey: mindfulness: 100% five facet mindfulness survey: describe: 95% erq survey: suppression: 9% grit scale survey: grit: 6% eating survey: uncontrolled eating: 4% selection optimization compensation survey: elective selection: 4% eating survey: emotional eating: 3%
five facet mindfulness survey: describe mindful attention awareness survey: mindfulness: 98% five facet mindfulness survey: act with awareness: 95% bis11 survey: Attentional: 93% erq survey: suppression: 19% sensation seeking survey: thrill adventure seeking: 7% dospert rt survey: recreational: 6% dospert eb survey: recreational: 6% impulsive venture survey: venturesomeness: 6%
five facet mindfulness survey: nonjudge time perspective survey: past negative: 99% bis bas survey: BIS: 98% ten item personality survey: emotional stability: 97% future time perspective survey: future time perspective: 89% erq survey: reappraisal: 84% five facet mindfulness survey: nonreact: 83% ten item personality survey: extraversion: 29% dickman survey: functional: 18%
five facet mindfulness survey: nonreact erq survey: reappraisal: 97% future time perspective survey: future time perspective: 95% ten item personality survey: emotional stability: 93% time perspective survey: past negative: 87% bis bas survey: BIS: 85% five facet mindfulness survey: nonjudge: 83% upps impulsivity survey: negative urgency: 37% upps impulsivity survey: positive urgency: 29%
five facet mindfulness survey: observe eating survey: cognitive restraint: 99% bis bas survey: BAS reward responsiveness: 74% bis bas survey: BAS drive: 57% eating survey: uncontrolled eating: 30% eating survey: emotional eating: 24% ten item personality survey: openness: 12% five facet mindfulness survey: nonjudge: 11% bis bas survey: BIS: 11%
future time perspective survey: future time perspective erq survey: reappraisal: 100% ten item personality survey: emotional stability: 96% five facet mindfulness survey: nonreact: 95% time perspective survey: past negative: 93% bis bas survey: BIS: 90% five facet mindfulness survey: nonjudge: 89% upps impulsivity survey: negative urgency: 26% ten item personality survey: extraversion: 22%
grit scale survey: grit selection optimization compensation survey: elective selection: 78% selection optimization compensation survey: optimization: ReflogTr: 58% upps impulsivity survey: lack of perseverance: 55% ten item personality survey: conscientiousness: ReflogTr: 53% self regulation survey: control: 53% brief self control survey: self control: 52% time perspective survey: future: 50% selection optimization compensation survey: compensation: 50%
impulsive venture survey: venturesomeness upps impulsivity survey: sensation seeking: 100% dospert rt survey: recreational: 100% sensation seeking survey: thrill adventure seeking: 100% dospert eb survey: recreational: 100% erq survey: suppression: 88% ten item personality survey: extraversion: 9% five facet mindfulness survey: describe: 6% dospert rp survey: recreational: 3%
mindful attention awareness survey: mindfulness bis11 survey: Attentional: 100% five facet mindfulness survey: act with awareness: 100% five facet mindfulness survey: describe: 98% erq survey: suppression: 10% eating survey: uncontrolled eating: 4% grit scale survey: grit: 3% eating survey: emotional eating: 3% selection optimization compensation survey: elective selection: 2%
mpq control survey: control: ReflogTr bis11 survey: Motor: logTr: 100% bis11 survey: Nonplanning: 100% ten item personality survey: conscientiousness: ReflogTr: 99% upps impulsivity survey: lack of perseverance: 98% self regulation survey: control: 98% upps impulsivity survey: lack of premeditation: 98% time perspective survey: future: 96% brief self control survey: self control: 76%
selection optimization compensation survey: compensation selection optimization compensation survey: loss based selection: 99% selection optimization compensation survey: optimization: ReflogTr: 99% theories of willpower survey: endorse limited resource: 80% selection optimization compensation survey: elective selection: 79% time perspective survey: present fatalistic: 69% grit scale survey: grit: 50% time perspective survey: future: 15% self regulation survey: control: 10%
selection optimization compensation survey: elective selection selection optimization compensation survey: optimization: ReflogTr: 88% selection optimization compensation survey: compensation: 79% grit scale survey: grit: 78% selection optimization compensation survey: loss based selection: 73% theories of willpower survey: endorse limited resource: 60% time perspective survey: present fatalistic: 52% time perspective survey: future: 27% upps impulsivity survey: lack of perseverance: 23%
selection optimization compensation survey: loss based selection selection optimization compensation survey: compensation: 99% selection optimization compensation survey: optimization: ReflogTr: 94% theories of willpower survey: endorse limited resource: 79% selection optimization compensation survey: elective selection: 73% time perspective survey: present fatalistic: 73% grit scale survey: grit: 45% time perspective survey: future: 14% self regulation survey: control: 9%
selection optimization compensation survey: optimization: ReflogTr selection optimization compensation survey: compensation: 99% selection optimization compensation survey: loss based selection: 94% selection optimization compensation survey: elective selection: 88% theories of willpower survey: endorse limited resource: 78% time perspective survey: present fatalistic: 67% grit scale survey: grit: 58% time perspective survey: future: 14% brief self control survey: self control: 10%
self regulation survey: control ten item personality survey: conscientiousness: ReflogTr: 100% upps impulsivity survey: lack of perseverance: 100% bis11 survey: Nonplanning: 99% bis11 survey: Motor: logTr: 98% mpq control survey: control: ReflogTr: 98% upps impulsivity survey: lack of premeditation: 95% time perspective survey: future: 94% brief self control survey: self control: 80%
sensation seeking survey: boredom susceptibility ten item personality survey: agreeableness: 83% sensation seeking survey: disinhibition: 66% time perspective survey: past positive: 60% sensation seeking survey: experience seeking: 51% dospert rt survey: social: 45% dospert eb survey: social: 41% ten item personality survey: openness: 31% bis bas survey: BAS fun seeking: 29%
sensation seeking survey: disinhibition sensation seeking survey: experience seeking: 88% ten item personality survey: openness: 72% bis bas survey: BAS fun seeking: 71% sensation seeking survey: boredom susceptibility: 66% time perspective survey: present hedonistic: 61% ten item personality survey: agreeableness: 31% dickman survey: functional: 29% bis bas survey: BAS drive: 21%
sensation seeking survey: experience seeking sensation seeking survey: disinhibition: 88% ten item personality survey: openness: 65% bis bas survey: BAS fun seeking: 60% sensation seeking survey: boredom susceptibility: 51% time perspective survey: present hedonistic: 51% dospert rt survey: social: 43% dospert eb survey: social: 37% time perspective survey: past positive: 33%
sensation seeking survey: thrill adventure seeking upps impulsivity survey: sensation seeking: 100% dospert rt survey: recreational: 100% dospert eb survey: recreational: 100% impulsive venture survey: venturesomeness: 100% erq survey: suppression: 89% ten item personality survey: extraversion: 9% five facet mindfulness survey: describe: 7% dospert rp survey: recreational: 3%
ten item personality survey: agreeableness time perspective survey: past positive: 91% sensation seeking survey: boredom susceptibility: 83% dospert rt survey: social: 68% dospert eb survey: social: 68% sensation seeking survey: disinhibition: 31% sensation seeking survey: experience seeking: 30% dospert rt survey: ethical: 15% dospert rt survey: health safety: 14%
ten item personality survey: conscientiousness: ReflogTr self regulation survey: control: 100% upps impulsivity survey: lack of perseverance: 100% bis11 survey: Nonplanning: 99% mpq control survey: control: ReflogTr: 99% bis11 survey: Motor: logTr: 99% upps impulsivity survey: lack of premeditation: 96% time perspective survey: future: 96% brief self control survey: self control: 77%
ten item personality survey: emotional stability bis bas survey: BIS: 99% time perspective survey: past negative: 99% five facet mindfulness survey: nonjudge: 97% future time perspective survey: future time perspective: 96% five facet mindfulness survey: nonreact: 93% erq survey: reappraisal: 92% ten item personality survey: extraversion: 23% upps impulsivity survey: negative urgency: 20%
ten item personality survey: extraversion dickman survey: functional: 91% time perspective survey: present hedonistic: 45% bis bas survey: BAS fun seeking: 37% ten item personality survey: openness: 36% bis bas survey: BAS drive: 34% five facet mindfulness survey: nonjudge: 29% eating survey: emotional eating: 29% bis bas survey: BIS: 27%
ten item personality survey: openness bis bas survey: BAS fun seeking: 99% time perspective survey: present hedonistic: 93% sensation seeking survey: disinhibition: 72% sensation seeking survey: experience seeking: 65% dickman survey: functional: 52% bis bas survey: BAS drive: 47% bis bas survey: BAS reward responsiveness: 40% ten item personality survey: extraversion: 36%
theories of willpower survey: endorse limited resource time perspective survey: present fatalistic: 85% selection optimization compensation survey: compensation: 80% selection optimization compensation survey: loss based selection: 79% selection optimization compensation survey: optimization: ReflogTr: 78% selection optimization compensation survey: elective selection: 60% grit scale survey: grit: 48% eating survey: uncontrolled eating: 18% eating survey: emotional eating: 18%
time perspective survey: future bis11 survey: Nonplanning: 97% ten item personality survey: conscientiousness: ReflogTr: 96% mpq control survey: control: ReflogTr: 96% upps impulsivity survey: lack of perseverance: 95% bis11 survey: Motor: logTr: 95% self regulation survey: control: 94% upps impulsivity survey: lack of premeditation: 93% brief self control survey: self control: 69%
time perspective survey: past negative five facet mindfulness survey: nonjudge: 99% ten item personality survey: emotional stability: 99% bis bas survey: BIS: 99% future time perspective survey: future time perspective: 93% erq survey: reappraisal: 88% five facet mindfulness survey: nonreact: 87% ten item personality survey: extraversion: 21% upps impulsivity survey: negative urgency: 19%
time perspective survey: past positive ten item personality survey: agreeableness: 91% dospert eb survey: social: 90% dospert rt survey: social: 87% sensation seeking survey: boredom susceptibility: 60% sensation seeking survey: experience seeking: 33% sensation seeking survey: disinhibition: 21% dickman survey: functional: 6% bis bas survey: BAS drive: 6%
time perspective survey: present fatalistic theories of willpower survey: endorse limited resource: 85% selection optimization compensation survey: loss based selection: 73% selection optimization compensation survey: compensation: 69% selection optimization compensation survey: optimization: ReflogTr: 67% selection optimization compensation survey: elective selection: 52% grit scale survey: grit: 46% self regulation survey: control: 32% brief self control survey: self control: 32%
time perspective survey: present hedonistic bis bas survey: BAS fun seeking: 100% ten item personality survey: openness: 93% sensation seeking survey: disinhibition: 61% dickman survey: functional: 58% sensation seeking survey: experience seeking: 51% bis bas survey: BAS drive: 49% ten item personality survey: extraversion: 45% bis bas survey: BAS reward responsiveness: 40%
upps impulsivity survey: lack of perseverance ten item personality survey: conscientiousness: ReflogTr: 100% self regulation survey: control: 100% bis11 survey: Nonplanning: 99% bis11 survey: Motor: logTr: 98% mpq control survey: control: ReflogTr: 98% time perspective survey: future: 95% upps impulsivity survey: lack of premeditation: 95% brief self control survey: self control: 75%
upps impulsivity survey: lack of premeditation bis11 survey: Nonplanning: 98% mpq control survey: control: ReflogTr: 98% bis11 survey: Motor: logTr: 97% ten item personality survey: conscientiousness: ReflogTr: 96% upps impulsivity survey: lack of perseverance: 95% self regulation survey: control: 95% time perspective survey: future: 93% brief self control survey: self control: 72%
upps impulsivity survey: negative urgency upps impulsivity survey: positive urgency: 99% brief self control survey: self control: 68% bis11 survey: Motor: logTr: 44% self regulation survey: control: 44% upps impulsivity survey: lack of premeditation: 43% bis11 survey: Nonplanning: 41% mpq control survey: control: ReflogTr: 41% ten item personality survey: conscientiousness: ReflogTr: 40%
upps impulsivity survey: positive urgency upps impulsivity survey: negative urgency: 99% brief self control survey: self control: 71% bis11 survey: Motor: logTr: 49% upps impulsivity survey: lack of premeditation: 49% self regulation survey: control: 49% bis11 survey: Nonplanning: 47% mpq control survey: control: ReflogTr: 46% ten item personality survey: conscientiousness: ReflogTr: 45%
upps impulsivity survey: sensation seeking dospert eb survey: recreational: 100% dospert rt survey: recreational: 100% impulsive venture survey: venturesomeness: 100% sensation seeking survey: thrill adventure seeking: 100% erq survey: suppression: 88% ten item personality survey: extraversion: 10% five facet mindfulness survey: describe: 6% dospert rp survey: recreational: 3%

Consensus clustering distances of variables within the same cluster according to original cluster

Hover over each cell to bold the DV. Columns are organized by closeness of DVs within cluster.

For instance, the first variable BIS11 Survey: Attentional is part of a cluster with 4 variables called "Mindfulness". The first two closest DVs were always clustered with BIS11: Attentional (across the 5000 simulations), while the furthest DV was only clustered with it 93% of the time.

Each cell contains a DV name and the percent of simulations it was clustered with the DV defining the row. Rows with more "red" indicate that the DV in that row was closer to all other DVs within the cluster.

In [17]:
display_cluster_DVs(survey_consensus, survey_results)
Out[17]:
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
bis11 survey: Attentional five facet mindfulness survey: act with awareness: 100% mindful attention awareness survey: mindfulness: 100% five facet mindfulness survey: describe: 93%
bis11 survey: Motor: logTr mpq control survey: control: ReflogTr: 100% bis11 survey: Nonplanning: 100% ten item personality survey: conscientiousness: ReflogTr: 99% upps impulsivity survey: lack of perseverance: 98% self regulation survey: control: 98% upps impulsivity survey: lack of premeditation: 97% time perspective survey: future: 95% brief self control survey: self control: 77% upps impulsivity survey: positive urgency: 49% upps impulsivity survey: negative urgency: 44%
bis11 survey: Nonplanning mpq control survey: control: ReflogTr: 100% bis11 survey: Motor: logTr: 100% ten item personality survey: conscientiousness: ReflogTr: 99% self regulation survey: control: 99% upps impulsivity survey: lack of perseverance: 99% upps impulsivity survey: lack of premeditation: 98% time perspective survey: future: 97% brief self control survey: self control: 74% upps impulsivity survey: positive urgency: 47% upps impulsivity survey: negative urgency: 41%
bis bas survey: BAS drive bis bas survey: BAS reward responsiveness: 98% five facet mindfulness survey: observe: 57% eating survey: cognitive restraint: 48%
bis bas survey: BAS fun seeking time perspective survey: present hedonistic: 100% ten item personality survey: openness: 99% sensation seeking survey: disinhibition: 71% sensation seeking survey: experience seeking: 60% dickman survey: functional: 52% ten item personality survey: extraversion: 37%
bis bas survey: BAS reward responsiveness bis bas survey: BAS drive: 98% five facet mindfulness survey: observe: 74% eating survey: cognitive restraint: 62%
bis bas survey: BIS ten item personality survey: emotional stability: 99% time perspective survey: past negative: 99% five facet mindfulness survey: nonjudge: 98% future time perspective survey: future time perspective: 90% five facet mindfulness survey: nonreact: 85% erq survey: reappraisal: 85%
brief self control survey: self control self regulation survey: control: 80% bis11 survey: Motor: logTr: 77% ten item personality survey: conscientiousness: ReflogTr: 77% mpq control survey: control: ReflogTr: 76% upps impulsivity survey: lack of perseverance: 75% bis11 survey: Nonplanning: 74% upps impulsivity survey: lack of premeditation: 72% upps impulsivity survey: positive urgency: 71% time perspective survey: future: 69% upps impulsivity survey: negative urgency: 68%
dickman survey: functional ten item personality survey: extraversion: 91% time perspective survey: present hedonistic: 58% bis bas survey: BAS fun seeking: 52% ten item personality survey: openness: 52% sensation seeking survey: disinhibition: 29% sensation seeking survey: experience seeking: 23%
dospert eb survey: ethical dospert eb survey: health safety: logTr: 100% dospert rt survey: ethical: 100% dospert rt survey: health safety: 99%
dospert eb survey: financial dospert rp survey: financial: 100% dospert rt survey: financial: 100%
dospert eb survey: health safety: logTr dospert eb survey: ethical: 100% dospert rt survey: ethical: 100% dospert rt survey: health safety: 99%
dospert eb survey: recreational dospert rt survey: recreational: 100% sensation seeking survey: thrill adventure seeking: 100% impulsive venture survey: venturesomeness: 100% upps impulsivity survey: sensation seeking: 100% erq survey: suppression: 89%
dospert eb survey: social dospert rt survey: social: 100% time perspective survey: past positive: 90% ten item personality survey: agreeableness: 68% sensation seeking survey: boredom susceptibility: 41%
dospert rp survey: ethical dospert rp survey: recreational: 100% dospert rp survey: health safety: 100% dospert rp survey: social: 88%
dospert rp survey: financial dospert eb survey: financial: 100% dospert rt survey: financial: 100%
dospert rp survey: health safety dospert rp survey: recreational: 100% dospert rp survey: ethical: 100% dospert rp survey: social: 90%
dospert rp survey: recreational dospert rp survey: ethical: 100% dospert rp survey: health safety: 100% dospert rp survey: social: 96%
dospert rp survey: social dospert rp survey: recreational: 96% dospert rp survey: health safety: 90% dospert rp survey: ethical: 88%
dospert rt survey: ethical dospert eb survey: ethical: 100% dospert eb survey: health safety: logTr: 100% dospert rt survey: health safety: 99%
dospert rt survey: financial dospert rp survey: financial: 100% dospert eb survey: financial: 100%
dospert rt survey: health safety dospert rt survey: ethical: 99% dospert eb survey: ethical: 99% dospert eb survey: health safety: logTr: 99%
dospert rt survey: recreational dospert eb survey: recreational: 100% sensation seeking survey: thrill adventure seeking: 100% impulsive venture survey: venturesomeness: 100% upps impulsivity survey: sensation seeking: 100% erq survey: suppression: 90%
dospert rt survey: social dospert eb survey: social: 100% time perspective survey: past positive: 87% ten item personality survey: agreeableness: 68% sensation seeking survey: boredom susceptibility: 45%
eating survey: cognitive restraint five facet mindfulness survey: observe: 99% bis bas survey: BAS reward responsiveness: 62% bis bas survey: BAS drive: 48%
eating survey: emotional eating eating survey: uncontrolled eating: 100%
eating survey: uncontrolled eating eating survey: emotional eating: 100%
erq survey: reappraisal future time perspective survey: future time perspective: 100% five facet mindfulness survey: nonreact: 97% ten item personality survey: emotional stability: 92% time perspective survey: past negative: 88% bis bas survey: BIS: 85% five facet mindfulness survey: nonjudge: 84%
erq survey: suppression dospert rt survey: recreational: 90% sensation seeking survey: thrill adventure seeking: 89% dospert eb survey: recreational: 89% upps impulsivity survey: sensation seeking: 88% impulsive venture survey: venturesomeness: 88%
five facet mindfulness survey: act with awareness bis11 survey: Attentional: 100% mindful attention awareness survey: mindfulness: 100% five facet mindfulness survey: describe: 95%
five facet mindfulness survey: describe mindful attention awareness survey: mindfulness: 98% five facet mindfulness survey: act with awareness: 95% bis11 survey: Attentional: 93%
five facet mindfulness survey: nonjudge time perspective survey: past negative: 99% bis bas survey: BIS: 98% ten item personality survey: emotional stability: 97% future time perspective survey: future time perspective: 89% erq survey: reappraisal: 84% five facet mindfulness survey: nonreact: 83%
five facet mindfulness survey: nonreact erq survey: reappraisal: 97% future time perspective survey: future time perspective: 95% ten item personality survey: emotional stability: 93% time perspective survey: past negative: 87% bis bas survey: BIS: 85% five facet mindfulness survey: nonjudge: 83%
five facet mindfulness survey: observe eating survey: cognitive restraint: 99% bis bas survey: BAS reward responsiveness: 74% bis bas survey: BAS drive: 57%
future time perspective survey: future time perspective erq survey: reappraisal: 100% ten item personality survey: emotional stability: 96% five facet mindfulness survey: nonreact: 95% time perspective survey: past negative: 93% bis bas survey: BIS: 90% five facet mindfulness survey: nonjudge: 89%
grit scale survey: grit selection optimization compensation survey: elective selection: 78% selection optimization compensation survey: optimization: ReflogTr: 58% selection optimization compensation survey: compensation: 50% theories of willpower survey: endorse limited resource: 48% time perspective survey: present fatalistic: 46% selection optimization compensation survey: loss based selection: 45%
impulsive venture survey: venturesomeness dospert eb survey: recreational: 100% dospert rt survey: recreational: 100% sensation seeking survey: thrill adventure seeking: 100% upps impulsivity survey: sensation seeking: 100% erq survey: suppression: 88%
mindful attention awareness survey: mindfulness bis11 survey: Attentional: 100% five facet mindfulness survey: act with awareness: 100% five facet mindfulness survey: describe: 98%
mpq control survey: control: ReflogTr bis11 survey: Motor: logTr: 100% bis11 survey: Nonplanning: 100% ten item personality survey: conscientiousness: ReflogTr: 99% upps impulsivity survey: lack of perseverance: 98% self regulation survey: control: 98% upps impulsivity survey: lack of premeditation: 98% time perspective survey: future: 96% brief self control survey: self control: 76% upps impulsivity survey: positive urgency: 46% upps impulsivity survey: negative urgency: 41%
selection optimization compensation survey: compensation selection optimization compensation survey: loss based selection: 99% selection optimization compensation survey: optimization: ReflogTr: 99% theories of willpower survey: endorse limited resource: 80% selection optimization compensation survey: elective selection: 79% time perspective survey: present fatalistic: 69% grit scale survey: grit: 50%
selection optimization compensation survey: elective selection selection optimization compensation survey: optimization: ReflogTr: 88% selection optimization compensation survey: compensation: 79% grit scale survey: grit: 78% selection optimization compensation survey: loss based selection: 73% theories of willpower survey: endorse limited resource: 60% time perspective survey: present fatalistic: 52%
selection optimization compensation survey: loss based selection selection optimization compensation survey: compensation: 99% selection optimization compensation survey: optimization: ReflogTr: 94% theories of willpower survey: endorse limited resource: 79% selection optimization compensation survey: elective selection: 73% time perspective survey: present fatalistic: 73% grit scale survey: grit: 45%
selection optimization compensation survey: optimization: ReflogTr selection optimization compensation survey: compensation: 99% selection optimization compensation survey: loss based selection: 94% selection optimization compensation survey: elective selection: 88% theories of willpower survey: endorse limited resource: 78% time perspective survey: present fatalistic: 67% grit scale survey: grit: 58%
self regulation survey: control ten item personality survey: conscientiousness: ReflogTr: 100% upps impulsivity survey: lack of perseverance: 100% bis11 survey: Nonplanning: 99% bis11 survey: Motor: logTr: 98% mpq control survey: control: ReflogTr: 98% upps impulsivity survey: lack of premeditation: 95% time perspective survey: future: 94% brief self control survey: self control: 80% upps impulsivity survey: positive urgency: 49% upps impulsivity survey: negative urgency: 44%
sensation seeking survey: boredom susceptibility ten item personality survey: agreeableness: 83% time perspective survey: past positive: 60% dospert rt survey: social: 45% dospert eb survey: social: 41%
sensation seeking survey: disinhibition sensation seeking survey: experience seeking: 88% ten item personality survey: openness: 72% bis bas survey: BAS fun seeking: 71% time perspective survey: present hedonistic: 61% dickman survey: functional: 29% ten item personality survey: extraversion: 17%
sensation seeking survey: experience seeking sensation seeking survey: disinhibition: 88% ten item personality survey: openness: 65% bis bas survey: BAS fun seeking: 60% time perspective survey: present hedonistic: 51% dickman survey: functional: 23% ten item personality survey: extraversion: 13%
sensation seeking survey: thrill adventure seeking dospert eb survey: recreational: 100% dospert rt survey: recreational: 100% impulsive venture survey: venturesomeness: 100% upps impulsivity survey: sensation seeking: 100% erq survey: suppression: 89%
ten item personality survey: agreeableness time perspective survey: past positive: 91% sensation seeking survey: boredom susceptibility: 83% dospert rt survey: social: 68% dospert eb survey: social: 68%
ten item personality survey: conscientiousness: ReflogTr self regulation survey: control: 100% upps impulsivity survey: lack of perseverance: 100% bis11 survey: Nonplanning: 99% mpq control survey: control: ReflogTr: 99% bis11 survey: Motor: logTr: 99% upps impulsivity survey: lack of premeditation: 96% time perspective survey: future: 96% brief self control survey: self control: 77% upps impulsivity survey: positive urgency: 45% upps impulsivity survey: negative urgency: 40%
ten item personality survey: emotional stability bis bas survey: BIS: 99% time perspective survey: past negative: 99% five facet mindfulness survey: nonjudge: 97% future time perspective survey: future time perspective: 96% five facet mindfulness survey: nonreact: 93% erq survey: reappraisal: 92%
ten item personality survey: extraversion dickman survey: functional: 91% time perspective survey: present hedonistic: 45% bis bas survey: BAS fun seeking: 37% ten item personality survey: openness: 36% sensation seeking survey: disinhibition: 17% sensation seeking survey: experience seeking: 13%
ten item personality survey: openness bis bas survey: BAS fun seeking: 99% time perspective survey: present hedonistic: 93% sensation seeking survey: disinhibition: 72% sensation seeking survey: experience seeking: 65% dickman survey: functional: 52% ten item personality survey: extraversion: 36%
theories of willpower survey: endorse limited resource time perspective survey: present fatalistic: 85% selection optimization compensation survey: compensation: 80% selection optimization compensation survey: loss based selection: 79% selection optimization compensation survey: optimization: ReflogTr: 78% selection optimization compensation survey: elective selection: 60% grit scale survey: grit: 48%
time perspective survey: future bis11 survey: Nonplanning: 97% ten item personality survey: conscientiousness: ReflogTr: 96% mpq control survey: control: ReflogTr: 96% upps impulsivity survey: lack of perseverance: 95% bis11 survey: Motor: logTr: 95% self regulation survey: control: 94% upps impulsivity survey: lack of premeditation: 93% brief self control survey: self control: 69% upps impulsivity survey: positive urgency: 39% upps impulsivity survey: negative urgency: 34%
time perspective survey: past negative five facet mindfulness survey: nonjudge: 99% ten item personality survey: emotional stability: 99% bis bas survey: BIS: 99% future time perspective survey: future time perspective: 93% erq survey: reappraisal: 88% five facet mindfulness survey: nonreact: 87%
time perspective survey: past positive ten item personality survey: agreeableness: 91% dospert eb survey: social: 90% dospert rt survey: social: 87% sensation seeking survey: boredom susceptibility: 60%
time perspective survey: present fatalistic theories of willpower survey: endorse limited resource: 85% selection optimization compensation survey: loss based selection: 73% selection optimization compensation survey: compensation: 69% selection optimization compensation survey: optimization: ReflogTr: 67% selection optimization compensation survey: elective selection: 52% grit scale survey: grit: 46%
time perspective survey: present hedonistic bis bas survey: BAS fun seeking: 100% ten item personality survey: openness: 93% sensation seeking survey: disinhibition: 61% dickman survey: functional: 58% sensation seeking survey: experience seeking: 51% ten item personality survey: extraversion: 45%
upps impulsivity survey: lack of perseverance self regulation survey: control: 100% ten item personality survey: conscientiousness: ReflogTr: 100% bis11 survey: Nonplanning: 99% bis11 survey: Motor: logTr: 98% mpq control survey: control: ReflogTr: 98% time perspective survey: future: 95% upps impulsivity survey: lack of premeditation: 95% brief self control survey: self control: 75% upps impulsivity survey: positive urgency: 43% upps impulsivity survey: negative urgency: 38%
upps impulsivity survey: lack of premeditation bis11 survey: Nonplanning: 98% mpq control survey: control: ReflogTr: 98% bis11 survey: Motor: logTr: 97% ten item personality survey: conscientiousness: ReflogTr: 96% upps impulsivity survey: lack of perseverance: 95% self regulation survey: control: 95% time perspective survey: future: 93% brief self control survey: self control: 72% upps impulsivity survey: positive urgency: 49% upps impulsivity survey: negative urgency: 43%
upps impulsivity survey: negative urgency upps impulsivity survey: positive urgency: 99% brief self control survey: self control: 68% bis11 survey: Motor: logTr: 44% self regulation survey: control: 44% upps impulsivity survey: lack of premeditation: 43% bis11 survey: Nonplanning: 41% mpq control survey: control: ReflogTr: 41% ten item personality survey: conscientiousness: ReflogTr: 40% upps impulsivity survey: lack of perseverance: 38% time perspective survey: future: 34%
upps impulsivity survey: positive urgency upps impulsivity survey: negative urgency: 99% brief self control survey: self control: 71% bis11 survey: Motor: logTr: 49% upps impulsivity survey: lack of premeditation: 49% self regulation survey: control: 49% bis11 survey: Nonplanning: 47% mpq control survey: control: ReflogTr: 46% ten item personality survey: conscientiousness: ReflogTr: 45% upps impulsivity survey: lack of perseverance: 43% time perspective survey: future: 39%
upps impulsivity survey: sensation seeking dospert eb survey: recreational: 100% dospert rt survey: recreational: 100% sensation seeking survey: thrill adventure seeking: 100% impulsive venture survey: venturesomeness: 100% erq survey: suppression: 88%

Task Cluster Robustness

Adjusted mutual information

Below is the distribution of adjusted mutual information scores comparing the original task clustering reported in the main paper to simulated clusters and the consensus cluster.

In [18]:
f = path.join(results['task'].get_output_dir(), 'cluster_robustness.pkl')
task_cluster_robustness = pickle.load(open(f, 'rb'))
task_consensus = task_cluster_robustness['consensusClust']
plot_HCA_AMI(task_consensus)

Closest values according to consensus clustering

Hover over each cell to bold the DV. Columns are organized by first closest DV to eighth closest DV. Each cell contains a DV name and the percent of simulations it was clustered with the DV defining the row.

In [19]:
display_closest_DVs(task_consensus)
Out[19]:
first second third fourth fifth sixth seventh eigth ninth tenth
adaptive n back: DDM-drift shape matching: stimulus interference DDM-drift: 79% simon: simon DDM-drift: 76% dot pattern expectancy: DDM-drift: 71% dot pattern expectancy: dprime: 71% cue/task switch: cue switch-cost DDM-drift: 70% recent probes: DDM-drift: 68% directed forgetting: DDM-drift: 68% recent probes: proactive interference DDM-drift: 63% cue/task switch: DDM-non-decision: 63% attention network task: orienting DDM-drift: 53%
adaptive n back: DDM-drift load adaptive n back: DDM-thresh: 87% holt laury survey: safe choices: 81% holt laury survey: risk aversion: 73% dot pattern expectancy: DDM-non-decision: 42% holt laury survey: beta: logTr: 37% two step decision: model free: 29% columbia card task cold: gain-sensitivity: logTr: 24% angling risk task always sunny: keep adjusted clicks: 23% spatial span: forward span: 22% columbia card task hot: loss-sensitivity: ReflogTr: 21%
adaptive n back: DDM-non-decision dot pattern expectancy: BX-BY DDM-drift: 69% stim selective stop signal: reactive control DDM-drift: 60% dot pattern expectancy: bias: 58% simon: simon DDM-drift: 56% shape matching: stimulus interference DDM-drift: 53% cue/task switch: DDM-non-decision: 49% attention network task: conflict DDM-drift: ReflogTr: 48% recent probes: proactive interference DDM-drift: 47% choice reaction time: DDM-drift: 46% dot pattern expectancy: AY-BY DDM-drift: 41%
adaptive n back: DDM-thresh adaptive n back: DDM-drift load: 87% holt laury survey: safe choices: 76% holt laury survey: risk aversion: 73% dot pattern expectancy: DDM-non-decision: 31% holt laury survey: beta: logTr: 31% shift task: model beta: logTr: 19% two step decision: model free: 19% stop signal: proactive slowing DDM-drift: 16% stroop: stroop DDM-drift: 14% columbia card task cold: gain-sensitivity: logTr: 13%
adaptive n back: mean load: logTr columbia card task hot: information use: 98% keep track: score: 92% tower of london: num optimal solutions: 84% digit span: forward span: 84% digit span: reverse span: 83% columbia card task cold: information use: 83% information sampling task: Fixed Win P correct: 80% ravens: score: 79% shift task: learning rate: 79% two step decision: model based: 77%
angling risk task always sunny: keep adjusted clicks columbia card task cold: gain-sensitivity: logTr: 98% two step decision: model free: 89% columbia card task hot: gain-sensitivity: logTr: 87% spatial span: forward span: 86% columbia card task hot: loss-sensitivity: ReflogTr: 86% spatial span: reverse span: 82% angling risk task always sunny: release adjusted clicks: 56% columbia card task hot: probability-sensitivity: 55% cognitive reflection survey: intuitive proportion: 48% cognitive reflection survey: correct proportion: 40%
angling risk task always sunny: keep coef of variation simon: DDM-drift: 92% shape matching: DDM-drift: 91% choice reaction time: DDM-drift: 76% stim selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 72% shift task: learning to learn: 67% go nogo: dprime: 64% stop signal: DDM-drift: 63% stroop: DDM-drift: 61% motor selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 61% recent probes: proactive interference DDM-drift: 58%
angling risk task always sunny: release adjusted clicks two step decision: model free: 58% angling risk task always sunny: keep adjusted clicks: 56% columbia card task cold: gain-sensitivity: logTr: 54% columbia card task hot: gain-sensitivity: logTr: 54% columbia card task hot: loss-sensitivity: ReflogTr: 43% spatial span: forward span: 42% writing task: neutral probability: 39% spatial span: reverse span: 39% stop signal: DDM-thresh: logTr: 37% motor selective stop signal: DDM-thresh: logTr: 34%
angling risk task always sunny: release coef of variation: logTr attention network task: DDM-drift: 52% information sampling task: Decreasing Win P correct: 37% stop signal: proactive slowing DDM-thresh: 36% stroop: DDM-drift: 34% motor selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 34% stop signal: DDM-drift: 32% go nogo: dprime: 32% stim selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 30% stim selective stop signal: DDM-thresh: logTr: 30% stop signal: DDM-thresh: logTr: 29%
attention network task: alerting DDM-drift cue/task switch: task switch-cost DDM-drift: 89% columbia card task cold: probability-sensitivity: 79% psychological refractory period two choices: PRP slope: 73% attention network task: orienting DDM-drift: 42% local global letter: DDM-drift: 34% hierarchical rule: score: 32% dietary decision: taste-sensitivity: 30% recent probes: DDM-drift: 26% directed forgetting: proactive interference DDM-drift: logTr: 26% directed forgetting: DDM-drift: 24%
attention network task: conflict DDM-drift: ReflogTr dot pattern expectancy: bias: 83% stim selective stop signal: reactive control DDM-drift: 75% dot pattern expectancy: BX-BY DDM-drift: 75% dot pattern expectancy: AY-BY DDM-drift: 74% simon: simon DDM-drift: 63% cue/task switch: DDM-non-decision: 63% shape matching: stimulus interference DDM-drift: 59% local global letter: switch-cost DDM-drift: 55% adaptive n back: DDM-non-decision: 48% adaptive n back: DDM-drift: 46%
attention network task: DDM-drift motor selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 88% stroop: DDM-drift: 88% stop signal: DDM-drift: 86% go nogo: dprime: 84% stim selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 79% stop signal: proactive slowing DDM-thresh: 76% motor selective stop signal: proactive control DDM-drift: 63% angling risk task always sunny: release coef of variation: logTr: 52% shift task: learning to learn: 46% angling risk task always sunny: keep coef of variation: 46%
attention network task: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr stim selective stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 98% simon: DDM-non-decision: 98% stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 98% stroop: DDM-non-decision: 98% choice reaction time: DDM-non-decision: logTr: 98% motor selective stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 97% stim selective stop signal: SSRT: 92% stop signal: SSRT low: 92% stop signal: SSRT high: logTr: 91% motor selective stop signal: SSRT: 91%
attention network task: DDM-thresh go nogo: bias: 91% choice reaction time: DDM-thresh: 87% shape matching: DDM-thresh: logTr: 78% simon: DDM-thresh: 77% local global letter: conflict DDM-drift: 74% cue/task switch: DDM-thresh: logTr: 73% stroop: DDM-thresh: logTr: 73% local global letter: DDM-thresh: 58% recent probes: DDM-thresh: 56% directed forgetting: DDM-thresh: 53%
attention network task: orienting DDM-drift recent probes: DDM-drift: 80% directed forgetting: DDM-drift: 78% dot pattern expectancy: DDM-drift: 74% dot pattern expectancy: dprime: 71% cue/task switch: cue switch-cost DDM-drift: 65% shift task: model learning rate: 63% directed forgetting: proactive interference DDM-drift: logTr: 62% cue/task switch: DDM-drift: 62% cue/task switch: task switch-cost DDM-drift: 57% adaptive n back: DDM-drift: 53%
bickel titrator: hyp discount rate large: logTr bickel titrator: hyp discount rate small: logTr: 100% kirby: hyp discount rate large: logTr: 100% kirby: hyp discount rate small: logTr: 100% bickel titrator: hyp discount rate medium: logTr: 100% discount titrate: percent patient: 99% columbia card task hot: avg cards chosen: 58% columbia card task cold: avg cards chosen: 43% dot pattern expectancy: DDM-thresh: logTr: 29% two step decision: perseverance: 25% information sampling task: Decreasing Win P correct: 17%
bickel titrator: hyp discount rate medium: logTr bickel titrator: hyp discount rate small: logTr: 100% kirby: hyp discount rate small: logTr: 100% bickel titrator: hyp discount rate large: logTr: 100% kirby: hyp discount rate large: logTr: 100% discount titrate: percent patient: 99% columbia card task hot: avg cards chosen: 58% columbia card task cold: avg cards chosen: 43% dot pattern expectancy: DDM-thresh: logTr: 28% two step decision: perseverance: 24% information sampling task: Decreasing Win P correct: 17%
bickel titrator: hyp discount rate small: logTr bickel titrator: hyp discount rate large: logTr: 100% discount titrate: percent patient: 100% bickel titrator: hyp discount rate medium: logTr: 100% kirby: hyp discount rate large: logTr: 100% kirby: hyp discount rate small: logTr: 100% columbia card task hot: avg cards chosen: 58% columbia card task cold: avg cards chosen: 44% dot pattern expectancy: DDM-thresh: logTr: 29% two step decision: perseverance: 25% information sampling task: Decreasing Win P correct: 17%
choice reaction time: DDM-drift shape matching: DDM-drift: 88% simon: DDM-drift: 85% recent probes: proactive interference DDM-drift: 85% angling risk task always sunny: keep coef of variation: 76% shift task: learning to learn: 66% dot pattern expectancy: dprime: 54% shape matching: stimulus interference DDM-drift: 54% cue/task switch: cue switch-cost DDM-drift: 52% dot pattern expectancy: DDM-drift: 51% simon: simon DDM-drift: 51%
choice reaction time: DDM-non-decision: logTr stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 99% simon: DDM-non-decision: 99% stim selective stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 99% stroop: DDM-non-decision: 99% motor selective stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 98% attention network task: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 98% stop signal: SSRT low: 95% stim selective stop signal: SSRT: 95% stop signal: SSRT high: logTr: 95% motor selective stop signal: SSRT: 94%
choice reaction time: DDM-thresh go nogo: bias: 96% simon: DDM-thresh: 95% shape matching: DDM-thresh: logTr: 94% cue/task switch: DDM-thresh: logTr: 92% local global letter: conflict DDM-drift: 89% attention network task: DDM-thresh: 87% local global letter: DDM-thresh: 75% recent probes: DDM-thresh: 74% directed forgetting: DDM-thresh: 69% dietary decision: health-sensitivity: 60%
cognitive reflection survey: correct proportion cognitive reflection survey: intuitive proportion: 99% columbia card task cold: loss-sensitivity: 91% adaptive n back: mean load: logTr: 70% columbia card task hot: information use: 67% tower of london: num optimal solutions: 67% keep track: score: 66% digit span: forward span: 65% digit span: reverse span: 63% columbia card task cold: information use: 63% ravens: score: 59%
cognitive reflection survey: intuitive proportion cognitive reflection survey: correct proportion: 99% columbia card task cold: loss-sensitivity: 89% adaptive n back: mean load: logTr: 65% columbia card task hot: information use: 63% tower of london: num optimal solutions: 59% keep track: score: 59% digit span: forward span: 57% digit span: reverse span: 55% columbia card task cold: information use: 55% spatial span: forward span: 52%
columbia card task cold: avg cards chosen two step decision: perseverance: 71% dot pattern expectancy: DDM-thresh: logTr: 64% discount titrate: percent patient: 45% kirby: hyp discount rate small: logTr: 45% kirby: hyp discount rate large: logTr: 44% bickel titrator: hyp discount rate small: logTr: 44% bickel titrator: hyp discount rate medium: logTr: 43% bickel titrator: hyp discount rate large: logTr: 43% hierarchical rule: score: 30% columbia card task hot: avg cards chosen: 26%
columbia card task cold: gain-sensitivity: logTr angling risk task always sunny: keep adjusted clicks: 98% two step decision: model free: 91% spatial span: forward span: 83% columbia card task hot: loss-sensitivity: ReflogTr: 82% columbia card task hot: gain-sensitivity: logTr: 82% spatial span: reverse span: 78% angling risk task always sunny: release adjusted clicks: 54% columbia card task hot: probability-sensitivity: 53% cognitive reflection survey: intuitive proportion: 51% cognitive reflection survey: correct proportion: 43%
columbia card task cold: information use digit span: reverse span: 99% digit span: forward span: 99% ravens: score: 98% information sampling task: Fixed Win P correct: 98% tower of london: num optimal solutions: 98% shift task: learning rate: 98% two step decision: model based: 95% keep track: score: 94% adaptive n back: mean load: logTr: 83% shift task: acc: 82%
columbia card task cold: loss-sensitivity cognitive reflection survey: correct proportion: 91% cognitive reflection survey: intuitive proportion: 89% adaptive n back: mean load: logTr: 76% columbia card task hot: information use: 73% keep track: score: 70% tower of london: num optimal solutions: 70% digit span: forward span: 69% digit span: reverse span: 67% columbia card task cold: information use: 66% ravens: score: 62%
columbia card task cold: probability-sensitivity attention network task: alerting DDM-drift: 79% cue/task switch: task switch-cost DDM-drift: 68% psychological refractory period two choices: PRP slope: 57% local global letter: DDM-drift: 34% hierarchical rule: score: 29% attention network task: orienting DDM-drift: 24% dietary decision: taste-sensitivity: 24% dot pattern expectancy: AY-BY DDM-drift: 22% shift task: acc: 22% ravens: score: 19%
columbia card task hot: avg cards chosen kirby: hyp discount rate large: logTr: 60% kirby: hyp discount rate small: logTr: 59% discount titrate: percent patient: 59% bickel titrator: hyp discount rate medium: logTr: 58% bickel titrator: hyp discount rate small: logTr: 58% bickel titrator: hyp discount rate large: logTr: 58% local global letter: DDM-non-decision: 35% columbia card task cold: avg cards chosen: 26% recent probes: DDM-non-decision: 25% information sampling task: Decreasing Win P correct: 20%
columbia card task hot: gain-sensitivity: logTr angling risk task always sunny: keep adjusted clicks: 87% columbia card task hot: loss-sensitivity: ReflogTr: 84% columbia card task cold: gain-sensitivity: logTr: 82% spatial span: forward span: 82% spatial span: reverse span: 79% two step decision: model free: 76% columbia card task hot: probability-sensitivity: 55% tower of london: avg move time: logTr: 55% angling risk task always sunny: release adjusted clicks: 54% cognitive reflection survey: intuitive proportion: 34%
columbia card task hot: information use adaptive n back: mean load: logTr: 98% keep track: score: 89% tower of london: num optimal solutions: 79% digit span: forward span: 79% digit span: reverse span: 78% columbia card task cold: information use: 78% information sampling task: Fixed Win P correct: 75% ravens: score: 74% shift task: learning rate: 74% columbia card task cold: loss-sensitivity: 73%
columbia card task hot: loss-sensitivity: ReflogTr spatial span: forward span: 99% spatial span: reverse span: 98% angling risk task always sunny: keep adjusted clicks: 86% columbia card task hot: gain-sensitivity: logTr: 84% columbia card task cold: gain-sensitivity: logTr: 82% columbia card task hot: probability-sensitivity: 74% two step decision: model free: 70% cognitive reflection survey: intuitive proportion: 49% tower of london: avg move time: logTr: 46% angling risk task always sunny: release adjusted clicks: 43%
columbia card task hot: probability-sensitivity spatial span: reverse span: 79% columbia card task hot: loss-sensitivity: ReflogTr: 74% spatial span: forward span: 73% columbia card task hot: information use: 60% columbia card task hot: gain-sensitivity: logTr: 55% angling risk task always sunny: keep adjusted clicks: 55% adaptive n back: mean load: logTr: 53% columbia card task cold: gain-sensitivity: logTr: 53% columbia card task cold: loss-sensitivity: 48% cognitive reflection survey: intuitive proportion: 46%
dietary decision: health-sensitivity local global letter: conflict DDM-drift: 73% cue/task switch: DDM-thresh: logTr: 68% simon: DDM-thresh: 67% shape matching: DDM-thresh: logTr: 65% local global letter: DDM-thresh: 62% choice reaction time: DDM-thresh: 60% directed forgetting: DDM-thresh: 60% recent probes: DDM-thresh: 59% go nogo: bias: 52% attention network task: DDM-thresh: 48%
dietary decision: taste-sensitivity hierarchical rule: score: 85% directed forgetting: proactive interference DDM-drift: logTr: 77% cue/task switch: DDM-drift: 74% local global letter: DDM-drift: 66% two step decision: perseverance: 50% attention network task: orienting DDM-drift: 49% recent probes: DDM-drift: 45% directed forgetting: DDM-drift: 44% dot pattern expectancy: DDM-drift: 40% cue/task switch: task switch-cost DDM-drift: 40%
digit span: forward span digit span: reverse span: 99% columbia card task cold: information use: 99% tower of london: num optimal solutions: 98% ravens: score: 96% information sampling task: Fixed Win P correct: 96% shift task: learning rate: 96% two step decision: model based: 95% keep track: score: 94% adaptive n back: mean load: logTr: 84% shift task: acc: 80%
digit span: reverse span columbia card task cold: information use: 99% digit span: forward span: 99% tower of london: num optimal solutions: 97% information sampling task: Fixed Win P correct: 97% ravens: score: 97% shift task: learning rate: 97% two step decision: model based: 95% keep track: score: 94% adaptive n back: mean load: logTr: 83% shift task: acc: 82%
directed forgetting: DDM-drift recent probes: DDM-drift: 99% dot pattern expectancy: DDM-drift: 99% dot pattern expectancy: dprime: 97% cue/task switch: cue switch-cost DDM-drift: 87% attention network task: orienting DDM-drift: 78% cue/task switch: DDM-drift: 69% adaptive n back: DDM-drift: 68% directed forgetting: proactive interference DDM-drift: logTr: 66% cue/task switch: DDM-non-decision: 64% recent probes: proactive interference DDM-drift: 57%
directed forgetting: DDM-non-decision information sampling task: Decreasing Win motivation: 70% information sampling task: Fixed Win motivation: 63% local global letter: DDM-non-decision: 61% motor selective stop signal: reactive control DDM-drift: 59% recent probes: DDM-non-decision: 53% shape matching: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 36% tower of london: num extra moves: 36% dot pattern expectancy: DDM-non-decision: 34% tower of london: planning time: 30% tower of london: avg move time: logTr: 26%
directed forgetting: DDM-thresh local global letter: DDM-thresh: 98% recent probes: DDM-thresh: 81% cue/task switch: DDM-thresh: logTr: 80% shape matching: DDM-thresh: logTr: 78% simon: DDM-thresh: 77% local global letter: conflict DDM-drift: 73% choice reaction time: DDM-thresh: 69% stroop: stroop DDM-drift: 61% dietary decision: health-sensitivity: 60% go nogo: bias: 59%
directed forgetting: proactive interference DDM-drift: logTr cue/task switch: DDM-drift: 87% dietary decision: taste-sensitivity: 77% recent probes: DDM-drift: 67% directed forgetting: DDM-drift: 66% attention network task: orienting DDM-drift: 62% dot pattern expectancy: DDM-drift: 62% dot pattern expectancy: dprime: 62% hierarchical rule: score: 58% cue/task switch: cue switch-cost DDM-drift: 54% local global letter: DDM-drift: 43%
discount titrate: percent patient kirby: hyp discount rate large: logTr: 100% kirby: hyp discount rate small: logTr: 100% bickel titrator: hyp discount rate small: logTr: 100% bickel titrator: hyp discount rate medium: logTr: 99% bickel titrator: hyp discount rate large: logTr: 99% columbia card task hot: avg cards chosen: 59% columbia card task cold: avg cards chosen: 45% dot pattern expectancy: DDM-thresh: logTr: 29% two step decision: perseverance: 26% information sampling task: Decreasing Win P correct: 18%
dot pattern expectancy: AY-BY DDM-drift dot pattern expectancy: bias: 79% attention network task: conflict DDM-drift: ReflogTr: 74% cue/task switch: DDM-non-decision: 70% dot pattern expectancy: BX-BY DDM-drift: 68% stim selective stop signal: reactive control DDM-drift: 68% local global letter: switch-cost DDM-drift: 52% simon: simon DDM-drift: 51% shape matching: stimulus interference DDM-drift: 48% adaptive n back: DDM-drift: 45% cue/task switch: cue switch-cost DDM-drift: 43%
dot pattern expectancy: BX-BY DDM-drift dot pattern expectancy: bias: 89% stim selective stop signal: reactive control DDM-drift: 85% attention network task: conflict DDM-drift: ReflogTr: 75% cue/task switch: DDM-non-decision: 73% adaptive n back: DDM-non-decision: 69% dot pattern expectancy: AY-BY DDM-drift: 68% simon: simon DDM-drift: 65% shape matching: stimulus interference DDM-drift: 62% local global letter: switch-cost DDM-drift: 56% adaptive n back: DDM-drift: 49%
dot pattern expectancy: bias stim selective stop signal: reactive control DDM-drift: 91% dot pattern expectancy: BX-BY DDM-drift: 89% attention network task: conflict DDM-drift: ReflogTr: 83% dot pattern expectancy: AY-BY DDM-drift: 79% cue/task switch: DDM-non-decision: 76% local global letter: switch-cost DDM-drift: 65% simon: simon DDM-drift: 62% shape matching: stimulus interference DDM-drift: 58% adaptive n back: DDM-non-decision: 58% adaptive n back: DDM-drift: 46%
dot pattern expectancy: dprime dot pattern expectancy: DDM-drift: 99% directed forgetting: DDM-drift: 97% recent probes: DDM-drift: 96% cue/task switch: cue switch-cost DDM-drift: 90% attention network task: orienting DDM-drift: 71% adaptive n back: DDM-drift: 71% cue/task switch: DDM-non-decision: 71% cue/task switch: DDM-drift: 64% recent probes: proactive interference DDM-drift: 63% directed forgetting: proactive interference DDM-drift: logTr: 62%
dot pattern expectancy: DDM-drift dot pattern expectancy: dprime: 99% directed forgetting: DDM-drift: 99% recent probes: DDM-drift: 98% cue/task switch: cue switch-cost DDM-drift: 89% attention network task: orienting DDM-drift: 74% adaptive n back: DDM-drift: 71% cue/task switch: DDM-non-decision: 70% cue/task switch: DDM-drift: 63% directed forgetting: proactive interference DDM-drift: logTr: 62% recent probes: proactive interference DDM-drift: 60%
dot pattern expectancy: DDM-non-decision holt laury survey: beta: logTr: 73% information sampling task: Decreasing Win motivation: 70% information sampling task: Fixed Win motivation: 63% adaptive n back: DDM-drift load: 42% directed forgetting: DDM-non-decision: 34% adaptive n back: DDM-thresh: 31% tower of london: avg move time: logTr: 30% tower of london: num extra moves: 27% tower of london: planning time: 27% holt laury survey: safe choices: 27%
dot pattern expectancy: DDM-thresh: logTr two step decision: perseverance: 75% columbia card task cold: avg cards chosen: 64% hierarchical rule: score: 46% dietary decision: taste-sensitivity: 39% local global letter: DDM-drift: 39% discount titrate: percent patient: 29% kirby: hyp discount rate large: logTr: 29% bickel titrator: hyp discount rate small: logTr: 29% bickel titrator: hyp discount rate large: logTr: 29% kirby: hyp discount rate small: logTr: 28%
go nogo: bias choice reaction time: DDM-thresh: 96% attention network task: DDM-thresh: 91% simon: DDM-thresh: 85% shape matching: DDM-thresh: logTr: 84% cue/task switch: DDM-thresh: logTr: 81% local global letter: conflict DDM-drift: 80% local global letter: DDM-thresh: 64% recent probes: DDM-thresh: 63% directed forgetting: DDM-thresh: 59% stroop: DDM-thresh: logTr: 54%
go nogo: dprime stop signal: DDM-drift: 100% motor selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 99% stroop: DDM-drift: 99% stim selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 95% attention network task: DDM-drift: 84% stop signal: proactive slowing DDM-thresh: 82% motor selective stop signal: proactive control DDM-drift: 75% angling risk task always sunny: keep coef of variation: 64% simon: DDM-drift: 64% shift task: learning to learn: 63%
hierarchical rule: score local global letter: DDM-drift: 90% dietary decision: taste-sensitivity: 85% directed forgetting: proactive interference DDM-drift: logTr: 58% two step decision: perseverance: 51% cue/task switch: DDM-drift: 51% dot pattern expectancy: DDM-thresh: logTr: 46% shift task: acc: 43% cue/task switch: task switch-cost DDM-drift: 39% attention network task: orienting DDM-drift: 34% attention network task: alerting DDM-drift: 32%
holt laury survey: beta: logTr dot pattern expectancy: DDM-non-decision: 73% information sampling task: Decreasing Win motivation: 49% information sampling task: Fixed Win motivation: 40% adaptive n back: DDM-drift load: 37% adaptive n back: DDM-thresh: 31% adaptive n back: DDM-non-decision: 31% directed forgetting: DDM-non-decision: 26% holt laury survey: safe choices: 25% motor selective stop signal: reactive control DDM-drift: 24% holt laury survey: risk aversion: 21%
holt laury survey: risk aversion holt laury survey: safe choices: 85% adaptive n back: DDM-thresh: 73% adaptive n back: DDM-drift load: 73% cognitive reflection survey: intuitive proportion: 22% dot pattern expectancy: DDM-non-decision: 22% holt laury survey: beta: logTr: 21% cognitive reflection survey: correct proportion: 21% columbia card task cold: loss-sensitivity: 19% two step decision: model free: 17% columbia card task cold: gain-sensitivity: logTr: 17%
holt laury survey: safe choices holt laury survey: risk aversion: 85% adaptive n back: DDM-drift load: 81% adaptive n back: DDM-thresh: 76% dot pattern expectancy: DDM-non-decision: 27% holt laury survey: beta: logTr: 25% cognitive reflection survey: intuitive proportion: 23% spatial span: forward span: 21% two step decision: model free: 21% spatial span: reverse span: 21% columbia card task cold: gain-sensitivity: logTr: 21%
information sampling task: Decreasing Win P correct stop signal: proactive slowing DDM-thresh: 39% angling risk task always sunny: release coef of variation: logTr: 37% stroop: DDM-drift: 35% attention network task: DDM-drift: 35% motor selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 35% stim selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 34% stop signal: DDM-drift: 34% go nogo: dprime: 34% two step decision: perseverance: 32% angling risk task always sunny: keep coef of variation: 26%
information sampling task: Decreasing Win motivation information sampling task: Fixed Win motivation: 96% directed forgetting: DDM-non-decision: 70% dot pattern expectancy: DDM-non-decision: 70% tower of london: num extra moves: 51% holt laury survey: beta: logTr: 49% tower of london: planning time: 47% tower of london: avg move time: logTr: 44% motor selective stop signal: reactive control DDM-drift: 38% writing task: positive probability: 35% local global letter: DDM-non-decision: 27%
information sampling task: Fixed Win P correct shift task: learning rate: 99% ravens: score: 98% columbia card task cold: information use: 98% digit span: reverse span: 97% digit span: forward span: 96% two step decision: model based: 95% tower of london: num optimal solutions: 95% keep track: score: 92% shift task: acc: 87% adaptive n back: mean load: logTr: 80%
information sampling task: Fixed Win motivation information sampling task: Decreasing Win motivation: 96% directed forgetting: DDM-non-decision: 63% dot pattern expectancy: DDM-non-decision: 63% tower of london: num extra moves: 62% tower of london: avg move time: logTr: 60% tower of london: planning time: 59% writing task: positive probability: 44% holt laury survey: beta: logTr: 40% motor selective stop signal: reactive control DDM-drift: 30% local global letter: DDM-non-decision: 26%
keep track: score columbia card task cold: information use: 94% digit span: forward span: 94% digit span: reverse span: 94% tower of london: num optimal solutions: 93% adaptive n back: mean load: logTr: 92% information sampling task: Fixed Win P correct: 92% shift task: learning rate: 92% ravens: score: 91% columbia card task hot: information use: 89% two step decision: model based: 88%
kirby: hyp discount rate large: logTr bickel titrator: hyp discount rate medium: logTr: 100% discount titrate: percent patient: 100% kirby: hyp discount rate small: logTr: 100% bickel titrator: hyp discount rate small: logTr: 100% bickel titrator: hyp discount rate large: logTr: 100% columbia card task hot: avg cards chosen: 60% columbia card task cold: avg cards chosen: 44% dot pattern expectancy: DDM-thresh: logTr: 29% two step decision: perseverance: 25% information sampling task: Decreasing Win P correct: 18%
kirby: hyp discount rate small: logTr bickel titrator: hyp discount rate small: logTr: 100% bickel titrator: hyp discount rate large: logTr: 100% discount titrate: percent patient: 100% bickel titrator: hyp discount rate medium: logTr: 100% kirby: hyp discount rate large: logTr: 100% columbia card task hot: avg cards chosen: 59% columbia card task cold: avg cards chosen: 45% dot pattern expectancy: DDM-thresh: logTr: 28% two step decision: perseverance: 26% information sampling task: Decreasing Win P correct: 18%
local global letter: conflict DDM-drift simon: DDM-thresh: 94% cue/task switch: DDM-thresh: logTr: 93% shape matching: DDM-thresh: logTr: 91% choice reaction time: DDM-thresh: 89% go nogo: bias: 80% local global letter: DDM-thresh: 78% recent probes: DDM-thresh: 75% attention network task: DDM-thresh: 74% directed forgetting: DDM-thresh: 73% dietary decision: health-sensitivity: 73%
local global letter: global bias DDM-drift motor selective stop signal: proactive control DDM-drift: 75% shift task: model decay: ReflogTr: 68% simple reaction time: avg rt: logTr: 65% stim selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 60% stop signal: DDM-drift: 59% go nogo: dprime: 59% stroop: DDM-drift: 58% motor selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 58% simon: DDM-drift: 57% shift task: learning to learn: 55%
local global letter: DDM-drift hierarchical rule: score: 90% dietary decision: taste-sensitivity: 66% shift task: acc: 60% directed forgetting: proactive interference DDM-drift: logTr: 43% shift task: learning rate: 41% information sampling task: Fixed Win P correct: 41% ravens: score: 40% two step decision: perseverance: 39% two step decision: model based: 39% dot pattern expectancy: DDM-thresh: logTr: 39%
local global letter: DDM-non-decision recent probes: DDM-non-decision: 96% shape matching: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 62% directed forgetting: DDM-non-decision: 61% columbia card task hot: avg cards chosen: 35% motor selective stop signal: reactive control DDM-drift: 33% information sampling task: Decreasing Win motivation: 27% tower of london: num extra moves: 27% information sampling task: Fixed Win motivation: 26% writing task: positive probability: 24% tower of london: planning time: 21%
local global letter: DDM-thresh directed forgetting: DDM-thresh: 98% recent probes: DDM-thresh: 87% cue/task switch: DDM-thresh: logTr: 85% shape matching: DDM-thresh: logTr: 84% simon: DDM-thresh: 83% local global letter: conflict DDM-drift: 78% choice reaction time: DDM-thresh: 75% go nogo: bias: 64% dietary decision: health-sensitivity: 62% stroop: stroop DDM-drift: 62%
local global letter: switch-cost DDM-drift stim selective stop signal: reactive control DDM-drift: 79% dot pattern expectancy: bias: 65% motor selective stop signal: reactive control DDM-drift: 57% dot pattern expectancy: BX-BY DDM-drift: 56% attention network task: conflict DDM-drift: ReflogTr: 55% dot pattern expectancy: AY-BY DDM-drift: 52% cue/task switch: DDM-non-decision: 38% adaptive n back: DDM-non-decision: 37% simon: simon DDM-drift: 26% shape matching: stimulus interference DDM-drift: 22%
motor selective stop signal: SSRT stop signal: SSRT low: 100% stop signal: SSRT high: logTr: 100% stim selective stop signal: SSRT: 100% motor selective stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 96% stop signal: proactive SSRT speeding: 95% stim selective stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 94% choice reaction time: DDM-non-decision: logTr: 94% stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 94% simon: DDM-non-decision: 93% stroop: DDM-non-decision: 91%
motor selective stop signal: DDM-drift stroop: DDM-drift: 100% stop signal: DDM-drift: 100% go nogo: dprime: 99% stim selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 94% attention network task: DDM-drift: 88% stop signal: proactive slowing DDM-thresh: 82% motor selective stop signal: proactive control DDM-drift: 75% angling risk task always sunny: keep coef of variation: 61% shift task: learning to learn: 60% simon: DDM-drift: 60%
motor selective stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr stim selective stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 99% stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 99% choice reaction time: DDM-non-decision: logTr: 98% simon: DDM-non-decision: 98% attention network task: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 97% stim selective stop signal: SSRT: 97% stroop: DDM-non-decision: 97% stop signal: SSRT low: 97% stop signal: SSRT high: logTr: 96% motor selective stop signal: SSRT: 96%
motor selective stop signal: DDM-thresh: logTr stim selective stop signal: DDM-thresh: logTr: 100% stop signal: DDM-thresh: logTr: 100% stroop: DDM-thresh: logTr: 69% writing task: neutral probability: 39% angling risk task always sunny: release adjusted clicks: 34% attention network task: DDM-thresh: 30% angling risk task always sunny: release coef of variation: logTr: 28% go nogo: bias: 18% choice reaction time: DDM-thresh: 11% writing task: positive probability: 9%
motor selective stop signal: proactive control DDM-drift stim selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 77% stop signal: DDM-drift: 76% go nogo: dprime: 75% stroop: DDM-drift: 75% motor selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 75% local global letter: global bias DDM-drift: 75% attention network task: DDM-drift: 63% simple reaction time: avg rt: logTr: 61% simon: DDM-drift: 58% angling risk task always sunny: keep coef of variation: 58%
motor selective stop signal: reactive control DDM-drift directed forgetting: DDM-non-decision: 59% local global letter: switch-cost DDM-drift: 57% information sampling task: Decreasing Win motivation: 38% stim selective stop signal: reactive control DDM-drift: 33% local global letter: DDM-non-decision: 33% information sampling task: Fixed Win motivation: 30% recent probes: DDM-non-decision: 28% holt laury survey: beta: logTr: 24% dot pattern expectancy: DDM-non-decision: 22% dot pattern expectancy: bias: 21%
probabilistic selection: positive learning bias stroop: DDM-non-decision: 45% attention network task: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 44% simon: DDM-non-decision: 43% choice reaction time: DDM-non-decision: logTr: 42% stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 42% stim selective stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 42% motor selective stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 42% shape matching: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 40% stim selective stop signal: SSRT: 38% stop signal: SSRT low: 38%
psychological refractory period two choices: PRP slope attention network task: alerting DDM-drift: 73% columbia card task cold: probability-sensitivity: 57% cue/task switch: task switch-cost DDM-drift: 55% dietary decision: health-sensitivity: 30% local global letter: conflict DDM-drift: 22% simon: DDM-thresh: 20% go nogo: bias: 20% cue/task switch: DDM-thresh: logTr: 20% choice reaction time: DDM-thresh: 19% shape matching: DDM-thresh: logTr: 17%
ravens: score shift task: learning rate: 98% columbia card task cold: information use: 98% information sampling task: Fixed Win P correct: 98% two step decision: model based: 98% digit span: reverse span: 97% digit span: forward span: 96% tower of london: num optimal solutions: 95% keep track: score: 91% shift task: acc: 84% adaptive n back: mean load: logTr: 79%
recent probes: DDM-drift directed forgetting: DDM-drift: 99% dot pattern expectancy: DDM-drift: 98% dot pattern expectancy: dprime: 96% cue/task switch: cue switch-cost DDM-drift: 87% attention network task: orienting DDM-drift: 80% adaptive n back: DDM-drift: 68% cue/task switch: DDM-drift: 68% directed forgetting: proactive interference DDM-drift: logTr: 67% cue/task switch: DDM-non-decision: 65% recent probes: proactive interference DDM-drift: 56%
recent probes: DDM-non-decision local global letter: DDM-non-decision: 96% shape matching: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 76% directed forgetting: DDM-non-decision: 53% stroop: DDM-non-decision: 29% attention network task: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 28% motor selective stop signal: reactive control DDM-drift: 28% stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 27% simon: DDM-non-decision: 27% choice reaction time: DDM-non-decision: logTr: 27% stim selective stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 26%
recent probes: DDM-thresh local global letter: DDM-thresh: 87% cue/task switch: DDM-thresh: logTr: 86% shape matching: DDM-thresh: logTr: 82% simon: DDM-thresh: 82% directed forgetting: DDM-thresh: 81% local global letter: conflict DDM-drift: 75% choice reaction time: DDM-thresh: 74% stroop: stroop DDM-drift: 65% go nogo: bias: 63% dietary decision: health-sensitivity: 59%
recent probes: proactive interference DDM-drift choice reaction time: DDM-drift: 85% shape matching: stimulus interference DDM-drift: 71% shape matching: DDM-drift: 68% simon: simon DDM-drift: 66% simon: DDM-drift: 64% adaptive n back: DDM-drift: 63% dot pattern expectancy: dprime: 63% dot pattern expectancy: DDM-drift: 60% cue/task switch: cue switch-cost DDM-drift: 59% angling risk task always sunny: keep coef of variation: 58%
shape matching: DDM-drift simon: DDM-drift: 99% angling risk task always sunny: keep coef of variation: 91% choice reaction time: DDM-drift: 88% shift task: learning to learn: 70% recent probes: proactive interference DDM-drift: 68% stim selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 64% go nogo: dprime: 57% stop signal: DDM-drift: 56% stroop: DDM-drift: 54% motor selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 54%
shape matching: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr recent probes: DDM-non-decision: 76% local global letter: DDM-non-decision: 62% stroop: DDM-non-decision: 57% attention network task: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 53% simon: DDM-non-decision: 52% stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 51% choice reaction time: DDM-non-decision: logTr: 51% stim selective stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 50% motor selective stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 49% stim selective stop signal: SSRT: 45%
shape matching: DDM-thresh: logTr simon: DDM-thresh: 97% cue/task switch: DDM-thresh: logTr: 96% choice reaction time: DDM-thresh: 94% local global letter: conflict DDM-drift: 91% local global letter: DDM-thresh: 84% go nogo: bias: 84% recent probes: DDM-thresh: 82% attention network task: DDM-thresh: 78% directed forgetting: DDM-thresh: 78% dietary decision: health-sensitivity: 65%
shape matching: stimulus interference DDM-drift simon: simon DDM-drift: 99% adaptive n back: DDM-drift: 79% recent probes: proactive interference DDM-drift: 71% cue/task switch: DDM-non-decision: 63% dot pattern expectancy: BX-BY DDM-drift: 62% attention network task: conflict DDM-drift: ReflogTr: 59% cue/task switch: cue switch-cost DDM-drift: 58% dot pattern expectancy: bias: 58% dot pattern expectancy: dprime: 57% dot pattern expectancy: DDM-drift: 56%
shift task: acc shift task: learning rate: 87% information sampling task: Fixed Win P correct: 87% ravens: score: 84% columbia card task cold: information use: 82% two step decision: model based: 82% digit span: reverse span: 82% digit span: forward span: 80% tower of london: num optimal solutions: 79% keep track: score: 76% adaptive n back: mean load: logTr: 65%
shift task: learning rate information sampling task: Fixed Win P correct: 99% ravens: score: 98% columbia card task cold: information use: 98% digit span: reverse span: 97% digit span: forward span: 96% two step decision: model based: 95% tower of london: num optimal solutions: 95% keep track: score: 92% shift task: acc: 87% adaptive n back: mean load: logTr: 79%
shift task: learning to learn simon: DDM-drift: 72% shape matching: DDM-drift: 70% angling risk task always sunny: keep coef of variation: 67% choice reaction time: DDM-drift: 66% go nogo: dprime: 63% stim selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 63% stop signal: DDM-drift: 62% motor selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 60% stroop: DDM-drift: 60% local global letter: global bias DDM-drift: 55%
shift task: model beta: logTr shift task: model decay: ReflogTr: 76% local global letter: global bias DDM-drift: 42% simple reaction time: avg rt: logTr: 35% motor selective stop signal: proactive control DDM-drift: 31% shift task: learning to learn: 27% shift task: model learning rate: 26% stop signal: DDM-drift: 22% go nogo: dprime: 21% motor selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 21% stroop: DDM-drift: 21%
shift task: model decay: ReflogTr shift task: model beta: logTr: 76% local global letter: global bias DDM-drift: 68% simple reaction time: avg rt: logTr: 60% motor selective stop signal: proactive control DDM-drift: 55% shift task: model learning rate: 47% shift task: learning to learn: 45% stop signal: DDM-drift: 40% go nogo: dprime: 40% motor selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 40% stim selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 40%
shift task: model learning rate simple reaction time: avg rt: logTr: 94% attention network task: orienting DDM-drift: 63% local global letter: global bias DDM-drift: 53% motor selective stop signal: proactive control DDM-drift: 49% shift task: model decay: ReflogTr: 47% cue/task switch: DDM-drift: 46% recent probes: DDM-drift: 46% directed forgetting: DDM-drift: 46% directed forgetting: proactive interference DDM-drift: logTr: 43% dot pattern expectancy: DDM-drift: 42%
simon: DDM-drift shape matching: DDM-drift: 99% angling risk task always sunny: keep coef of variation: 92% choice reaction time: DDM-drift: 85% shift task: learning to learn: 72% stim selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 70% go nogo: dprime: 64% recent probes: proactive interference DDM-drift: 64% stop signal: DDM-drift: 62% stroop: DDM-drift: 60% motor selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 60%
simon: DDM-non-decision stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 99% choice reaction time: DDM-non-decision: logTr: 99% stroop: DDM-non-decision: 99% stim selective stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 99% attention network task: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 98% motor selective stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 98% stop signal: SSRT low: 94% stim selective stop signal: SSRT: 94% stop signal: SSRT high: logTr: 94% motor selective stop signal: SSRT: 93%
simon: DDM-thresh cue/task switch: DDM-thresh: logTr: 99% shape matching: DDM-thresh: logTr: 97% choice reaction time: DDM-thresh: 95% local global letter: conflict DDM-drift: 94% go nogo: bias: 85% local global letter: DDM-thresh: 83% recent probes: DDM-thresh: 82% directed forgetting: DDM-thresh: 77% attention network task: DDM-thresh: 77% dietary decision: health-sensitivity: 67%
simon: simon DDM-drift shape matching: stimulus interference DDM-drift: 99% adaptive n back: DDM-drift: 76% recent probes: proactive interference DDM-drift: 66% dot pattern expectancy: BX-BY DDM-drift: 65% cue/task switch: DDM-non-decision: 64% attention network task: conflict DDM-drift: ReflogTr: 63% dot pattern expectancy: bias: 62% adaptive n back: DDM-non-decision: 56% cue/task switch: cue switch-cost DDM-drift: 55% dot pattern expectancy: dprime: 54%
simple reaction time: avg rt: logTr shift task: model learning rate: 94% local global letter: global bias DDM-drift: 65% motor selective stop signal: proactive control DDM-drift: 61% shift task: model decay: ReflogTr: 60% attention network task: orienting DDM-drift: 51% simon: DDM-drift: 42% shape matching: DDM-drift: 40% angling risk task always sunny: keep coef of variation: 40% cue/task switch: DDM-drift: 38% directed forgetting: DDM-drift: 37%
spatial span: forward span spatial span: reverse span: 99% columbia card task hot: loss-sensitivity: ReflogTr: 99% angling risk task always sunny: keep adjusted clicks: 86% columbia card task cold: gain-sensitivity: logTr: 83% columbia card task hot: gain-sensitivity: logTr: 82% columbia card task hot: probability-sensitivity: 73% two step decision: model free: 70% cognitive reflection survey: intuitive proportion: 52% columbia card task cold: loss-sensitivity: 45% cognitive reflection survey: correct proportion: 43%
spatial span: reverse span spatial span: forward span: 99% columbia card task hot: loss-sensitivity: ReflogTr: 98% angling risk task always sunny: keep adjusted clicks: 82% columbia card task hot: probability-sensitivity: 79% columbia card task hot: gain-sensitivity: logTr: 79% columbia card task cold: gain-sensitivity: logTr: 78% two step decision: model free: 65% cognitive reflection survey: intuitive proportion: 51% columbia card task cold: loss-sensitivity: 46% tower of london: avg move time: logTr: 44%
stim selective stop signal: SSRT stop signal: SSRT low: 100% motor selective stop signal: SSRT: 100% stop signal: SSRT high: logTr: 100% motor selective stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 97% stop signal: proactive SSRT speeding: 95% stim selective stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 95% choice reaction time: DDM-non-decision: logTr: 95% stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 94% simon: DDM-non-decision: 94% stroop: DDM-non-decision: 92%
stim selective stop signal: DDM-drift go nogo: dprime: 95% stop signal: DDM-drift: 95% stroop: DDM-drift: 94% motor selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 94% attention network task: DDM-drift: 79% motor selective stop signal: proactive control DDM-drift: 77% stop signal: proactive slowing DDM-thresh: 75% angling risk task always sunny: keep coef of variation: 72% simon: DDM-drift: 70% shape matching: DDM-drift: 64%
stim selective stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr motor selective stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 99% stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 99% choice reaction time: DDM-non-decision: logTr: 99% simon: DDM-non-decision: 99% attention network task: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 98% stroop: DDM-non-decision: 98% stim selective stop signal: SSRT: 95% stop signal: SSRT high: logTr: 95% stop signal: SSRT low: 95% motor selective stop signal: SSRT: 94%
stim selective stop signal: DDM-thresh: logTr motor selective stop signal: DDM-thresh: logTr: 100% stop signal: DDM-thresh: logTr: 99% stroop: DDM-thresh: logTr: 66% writing task: neutral probability: 37% angling risk task always sunny: release adjusted clicks: 31% attention network task: DDM-thresh: 30% angling risk task always sunny: release coef of variation: logTr: 30% go nogo: bias: 19% choice reaction time: DDM-thresh: 12% shape matching: DDM-thresh: logTr: 9%
stim selective stop signal: reactive control DDM-drift dot pattern expectancy: bias: 91% dot pattern expectancy: BX-BY DDM-drift: 85% local global letter: switch-cost DDM-drift: 79% attention network task: conflict DDM-drift: ReflogTr: 75% dot pattern expectancy: AY-BY DDM-drift: 68% cue/task switch: DDM-non-decision: 61% adaptive n back: DDM-non-decision: 60% simon: simon DDM-drift: 51% shape matching: stimulus interference DDM-drift: 47% adaptive n back: DDM-drift: 35%
stop signal: SSRT high: logTr motor selective stop signal: SSRT: 100% stim selective stop signal: SSRT: 100% stop signal: SSRT low: 100% motor selective stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 96% stop signal: proactive SSRT speeding: 95% stim selective stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 95% choice reaction time: DDM-non-decision: logTr: 95% stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 94% simon: DDM-non-decision: 94% stroop: DDM-non-decision: 92%
stop signal: SSRT low motor selective stop signal: SSRT: 100% stim selective stop signal: SSRT: 100% stop signal: SSRT high: logTr: 100% motor selective stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 97% stop signal: proactive SSRT speeding: 95% choice reaction time: DDM-non-decision: logTr: 95% stim selective stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 95% stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 94% simon: DDM-non-decision: 94% stroop: DDM-non-decision: 92%
stop signal: DDM-drift motor selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 100% go nogo: dprime: 100% stroop: DDM-drift: 99% stim selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 95% attention network task: DDM-drift: 86% stop signal: proactive slowing DDM-thresh: 82% motor selective stop signal: proactive control DDM-drift: 76% angling risk task always sunny: keep coef of variation: 63% simon: DDM-drift: 62% shift task: learning to learn: 62%
stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr choice reaction time: DDM-non-decision: logTr: 99% simon: DDM-non-decision: 99% stim selective stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 99% motor selective stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 99% stroop: DDM-non-decision: 98% attention network task: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 98% stim selective stop signal: SSRT: 94% stop signal: SSRT low: 94% stop signal: SSRT high: logTr: 94% motor selective stop signal: SSRT: 94%
stop signal: DDM-thresh: logTr motor selective stop signal: DDM-thresh: logTr: 100% stim selective stop signal: DDM-thresh: logTr: 99% stroop: DDM-thresh: logTr: 63% writing task: neutral probability: 41% angling risk task always sunny: release adjusted clicks: 37% angling risk task always sunny: release coef of variation: logTr: 29% attention network task: DDM-thresh: 27% go nogo: bias: 17% choice reaction time: DDM-thresh: 10% writing task: positive probability: 9%
stop signal: proactive SSRT speeding motor selective stop signal: SSRT: 95% stim selective stop signal: SSRT: 95% stop signal: SSRT low: 95% stop signal: SSRT high: logTr: 95% motor selective stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 91% choice reaction time: DDM-non-decision: logTr: 90% stim selective stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 90% stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 89% simon: DDM-non-decision: 88% stroop: DDM-non-decision: 87%
stop signal: proactive slowing DDM-drift stroop: stroop DDM-drift: 38% directed forgetting: DDM-thresh: 38% local global letter: DDM-thresh: 37% recent probes: DDM-thresh: 36% cue/task switch: DDM-thresh: logTr: 31% shape matching: DDM-thresh: logTr: 31% simon: DDM-thresh: 29% local global letter: conflict DDM-drift: 28% choice reaction time: DDM-thresh: 27% dietary decision: health-sensitivity: 25%
stop signal: proactive slowing DDM-thresh stroop: DDM-drift: 82% motor selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 82% stop signal: DDM-drift: 82% go nogo: dprime: 82% attention network task: DDM-drift: 76% stim selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 75% motor selective stop signal: proactive control DDM-drift: 56% shift task: learning to learn: 49% angling risk task always sunny: keep coef of variation: 47% simon: DDM-drift: 46%
stroop: DDM-drift motor selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 100% stop signal: DDM-drift: 99% go nogo: dprime: 99% stim selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 94% attention network task: DDM-drift: 88% stop signal: proactive slowing DDM-thresh: 82% motor selective stop signal: proactive control DDM-drift: 75% angling risk task always sunny: keep coef of variation: 61% simon: DDM-drift: 60% shift task: learning to learn: 60%
stroop: DDM-non-decision simon: DDM-non-decision: 99% choice reaction time: DDM-non-decision: logTr: 99% stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 98% attention network task: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 98% stim selective stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 98% motor selective stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 97% stim selective stop signal: SSRT: 92% stop signal: SSRT low: 92% stop signal: SSRT high: logTr: 92% motor selective stop signal: SSRT: 91%
stroop: DDM-thresh: logTr attention network task: DDM-thresh: 73% motor selective stop signal: DDM-thresh: logTr: 69% stim selective stop signal: DDM-thresh: logTr: 66% stop signal: DDM-thresh: logTr: 63% go nogo: bias: 54% choice reaction time: DDM-thresh: 48% shape matching: DDM-thresh: logTr: 42% local global letter: conflict DDM-drift: 41% simon: DDM-thresh: 40% cue/task switch: DDM-thresh: logTr: 37%
stroop: stroop DDM-drift recent probes: DDM-thresh: 65% local global letter: DDM-thresh: 62% directed forgetting: DDM-thresh: 61% cue/task switch: DDM-thresh: logTr: 47% simon: DDM-thresh: 45% shape matching: DDM-thresh: logTr: 44% local global letter: conflict DDM-drift: 41% stop signal: proactive slowing DDM-drift: 38% choice reaction time: DDM-thresh: 38% dietary decision: health-sensitivity: 37%
cue/task switch: cue switch-cost DDM-drift dot pattern expectancy: dprime: 90% dot pattern expectancy: DDM-drift: 89% directed forgetting: DDM-drift: 87% recent probes: DDM-drift: 87% cue/task switch: DDM-non-decision: 72% adaptive n back: DDM-drift: 70% attention network task: orienting DDM-drift: 65% recent probes: proactive interference DDM-drift: 59% shape matching: stimulus interference DDM-drift: 58% cue/task switch: DDM-drift: 56%
cue/task switch: DDM-drift directed forgetting: proactive interference DDM-drift: logTr: 87% dietary decision: taste-sensitivity: 74% directed forgetting: DDM-drift: 69% recent probes: DDM-drift: 68% dot pattern expectancy: dprime: 64% dot pattern expectancy: DDM-drift: 63% attention network task: orienting DDM-drift: 62% cue/task switch: cue switch-cost DDM-drift: 56% hierarchical rule: score: 51% shift task: model learning rate: 46%
cue/task switch: DDM-non-decision dot pattern expectancy: bias: 76% dot pattern expectancy: BX-BY DDM-drift: 73% cue/task switch: cue switch-cost DDM-drift: 72% dot pattern expectancy: dprime: 71% dot pattern expectancy: DDM-drift: 70% dot pattern expectancy: AY-BY DDM-drift: 70% recent probes: DDM-drift: 65% simon: simon DDM-drift: 64% directed forgetting: DDM-drift: 64% adaptive n back: DDM-drift: 63%
cue/task switch: DDM-thresh: logTr simon: DDM-thresh: 99% shape matching: DDM-thresh: logTr: 96% local global letter: conflict DDM-drift: 93% choice reaction time: DDM-thresh: 92% recent probes: DDM-thresh: 86% local global letter: DDM-thresh: 85% go nogo: bias: 81% directed forgetting: DDM-thresh: 80% attention network task: DDM-thresh: 73% dietary decision: health-sensitivity: 68%
cue/task switch: task switch-cost DDM-drift attention network task: alerting DDM-drift: 89% columbia card task cold: probability-sensitivity: 68% attention network task: orienting DDM-drift: 57% psychological refractory period two choices: PRP slope: 55% recent probes: DDM-drift: 41% dietary decision: taste-sensitivity: 40% hierarchical rule: score: 39% directed forgetting: DDM-drift: 39% directed forgetting: proactive interference DDM-drift: logTr: 38% local global letter: DDM-drift: 38%
tower of london: avg move time: logTr tower of london: planning time: 78% tower of london: num extra moves: 60% information sampling task: Fixed Win motivation: 60% columbia card task hot: gain-sensitivity: logTr: 55% writing task: positive probability: 48% columbia card task hot: loss-sensitivity: ReflogTr: 46% information sampling task: Decreasing Win motivation: 44% spatial span: reverse span: 44% spatial span: forward span: 42% columbia card task hot: probability-sensitivity: 40%
tower of london: num extra moves tower of london: planning time: 90% writing task: positive probability: 89% information sampling task: Fixed Win motivation: 62% tower of london: avg move time: logTr: 60% writing task: neutral probability: 54% information sampling task: Decreasing Win motivation: 51% directed forgetting: DDM-non-decision: 36% dot pattern expectancy: DDM-non-decision: 27% local global letter: DDM-non-decision: 27% recent probes: DDM-non-decision: 22%
tower of london: num optimal solutions columbia card task cold: information use: 98% digit span: forward span: 98% digit span: reverse span: 97% ravens: score: 95% information sampling task: Fixed Win P correct: 95% shift task: learning rate: 95% keep track: score: 93% two step decision: model based: 93% adaptive n back: mean load: logTr: 84% columbia card task hot: information use: 79%
tower of london: planning time tower of london: num extra moves: 90% writing task: positive probability: 79% tower of london: avg move time: logTr: 78% information sampling task: Fixed Win motivation: 59% writing task: neutral probability: 51% information sampling task: Decreasing Win motivation: 47% columbia card task hot: gain-sensitivity: logTr: 32% directed forgetting: DDM-non-decision: 30% dot pattern expectancy: DDM-non-decision: 27% local global letter: DDM-non-decision: 21%
two step decision: model based ravens: score: 98% columbia card task cold: information use: 95% digit span: reverse span: 95% information sampling task: Fixed Win P correct: 95% shift task: learning rate: 95% digit span: forward span: 95% tower of london: num optimal solutions: 93% keep track: score: 88% shift task: acc: 82% adaptive n back: mean load: logTr: 77%
two step decision: model free columbia card task cold: gain-sensitivity: logTr: 91% angling risk task always sunny: keep adjusted clicks: 89% columbia card task hot: gain-sensitivity: logTr: 76% spatial span: forward span: 70% columbia card task hot: loss-sensitivity: ReflogTr: 70% spatial span: reverse span: 65% angling risk task always sunny: release adjusted clicks: 58% columbia card task hot: probability-sensitivity: 42% cognitive reflection survey: intuitive proportion: 39% tower of london: avg move time: logTr: 34%
two step decision: perseverance dot pattern expectancy: DDM-thresh: logTr: 75% columbia card task cold: avg cards chosen: 71% hierarchical rule: score: 51% dietary decision: taste-sensitivity: 50% local global letter: DDM-drift: 39% directed forgetting: proactive interference DDM-drift: logTr: 36% cue/task switch: DDM-drift: 33% information sampling task: Decreasing Win P correct: 32% discount titrate: percent patient: 26% kirby: hyp discount rate small: logTr: 26%
writing task: neutral probability writing task: positive probability: 66% tower of london: num extra moves: 54% tower of london: planning time: 51% stop signal: DDM-thresh: logTr: 41% motor selective stop signal: DDM-thresh: logTr: 39% angling risk task always sunny: release adjusted clicks: 39% stim selective stop signal: DDM-thresh: logTr: 37% tower of london: avg move time: logTr: 28% stroop: DDM-thresh: logTr: 24% angling risk task always sunny: release coef of variation: logTr: 20%
writing task: positive probability tower of london: num extra moves: 89% tower of london: planning time: 79% writing task: neutral probability: 66% tower of london: avg move time: logTr: 48% information sampling task: Fixed Win motivation: 44% information sampling task: Decreasing Win motivation: 35% directed forgetting: DDM-non-decision: 26% local global letter: DDM-non-decision: 24% recent probes: DDM-non-decision: 20% dot pattern expectancy: DDM-non-decision: 17%

Consensus clustering distances of variables within the same cluster according to original cluster

Hover over each cell to bold the DV. Columns are organized by closeness of DVs within cluster.

For instance, the first variable, the Adaptive N-back drift rate, is part of a cluster with 9 DVs called "Conflict Processing". The closest DV was clustered with the adaptive n-back drift rate 79%, while the furthest DV in the cluster was associated 35% of the time.

Each cell contains a DV name and the percent of simulations it was clustered with the DV defining the row.Rows with more "red" indicate that the DV in that row was closer to all other DVs within the cluster.

In [20]:
display_cluster_DVs(task_consensus, task_results)
Out[20]:
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
adaptive n back: DDM-drift shape matching: stimulus interference DDM-drift: 79% simon: simon DDM-drift: 76% cue/task switch: DDM-non-decision: 63% dot pattern expectancy: BX-BY DDM-drift: 49% attention network task: conflict DDM-drift: ReflogTr: 46% dot pattern expectancy: bias: 46% dot pattern expectancy: AY-BY DDM-drift: 45% stim selective stop signal: reactive control DDM-drift: 35%
adaptive n back: DDM-drift load adaptive n back: DDM-thresh: 87% holt laury survey: safe choices: 81% holt laury survey: risk aversion: 73%
adaptive n back: DDM-non-decision local global letter: switch-cost DDM-drift: 37% holt laury survey: beta: logTr: 31% motor selective stop signal: reactive control DDM-drift: 18% dot pattern expectancy: DDM-non-decision: 12% information sampling task: Decreasing Win motivation: 8% information sampling task: Fixed Win motivation: 5% directed forgetting: DDM-non-decision: 4%
adaptive n back: DDM-thresh adaptive n back: DDM-drift load: 87% holt laury survey: safe choices: 76% holt laury survey: risk aversion: 73%
adaptive n back: mean load: logTr columbia card task hot: information use: 98% keep track: score: 92% tower of london: num optimal solutions: 84% digit span: forward span: 84% digit span: reverse span: 83% columbia card task cold: information use: 83% information sampling task: Fixed Win P correct: 80% ravens: score: 79% shift task: learning rate: 79% two step decision: model based: 77% columbia card task cold: loss-sensitivity: 76% cognitive reflection survey: correct proportion: 70% shift task: acc: 65% cognitive reflection survey: intuitive proportion: 65%
angling risk task always sunny: keep adjusted clicks columbia card task cold: gain-sensitivity: logTr: 98% two step decision: model free: 89% columbia card task hot: gain-sensitivity: logTr: 87% spatial span: forward span: 86% columbia card task hot: loss-sensitivity: ReflogTr: 86% spatial span: reverse span: 82% angling risk task always sunny: release adjusted clicks: 56% columbia card task hot: probability-sensitivity: 55%
angling risk task always sunny: keep coef of variation simon: DDM-drift: 92% shape matching: DDM-drift: 91% choice reaction time: DDM-drift: 76% stim selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 72% shift task: learning to learn: 67% go nogo: dprime: 64% stop signal: DDM-drift: 63% stroop: DDM-drift: 61% motor selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 61% recent probes: proactive interference DDM-drift: 58% motor selective stop signal: proactive control DDM-drift: 58% local global letter: global bias DDM-drift: 54% stop signal: proactive slowing DDM-thresh: 47% attention network task: DDM-drift: 46% shift task: model decay: ReflogTr: 35% information sampling task: Decreasing Win P correct: 26% shift task: model beta: logTr: 16% angling risk task always sunny: release coef of variation: logTr: 15%
angling risk task always sunny: release adjusted clicks two step decision: model free: 58% angling risk task always sunny: keep adjusted clicks: 56% columbia card task cold: gain-sensitivity: logTr: 54% columbia card task hot: gain-sensitivity: logTr: 54% columbia card task hot: loss-sensitivity: ReflogTr: 43% spatial span: forward span: 42% spatial span: reverse span: 39% columbia card task hot: probability-sensitivity: 26%
angling risk task always sunny: release coef of variation: logTr attention network task: DDM-drift: 52% information sampling task: Decreasing Win P correct: 37% stop signal: proactive slowing DDM-thresh: 36% stroop: DDM-drift: 34% motor selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 34% stop signal: DDM-drift: 32% go nogo: dprime: 32% stim selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 30% motor selective stop signal: proactive control DDM-drift: 21% shift task: learning to learn: 15% angling risk task always sunny: keep coef of variation: 15% local global letter: global bias DDM-drift: 14% simon: DDM-drift: 13% shape matching: DDM-drift: 11% shift task: model decay: ReflogTr: 8% choice reaction time: DDM-drift: 7% shift task: model beta: logTr: 5% recent probes: proactive interference DDM-drift: 3%
attention network task: alerting DDM-drift cue/task switch: task switch-cost DDM-drift: 89% columbia card task cold: probability-sensitivity: 79% psychological refractory period two choices: PRP slope: 73%
attention network task: conflict DDM-drift: ReflogTr dot pattern expectancy: bias: 83% stim selective stop signal: reactive control DDM-drift: 75% dot pattern expectancy: BX-BY DDM-drift: 75% dot pattern expectancy: AY-BY DDM-drift: 74% simon: simon DDM-drift: 63% cue/task switch: DDM-non-decision: 63% shape matching: stimulus interference DDM-drift: 59% adaptive n back: DDM-drift: 46%
attention network task: DDM-drift motor selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 88% stroop: DDM-drift: 88% stop signal: DDM-drift: 86% go nogo: dprime: 84% stim selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 79% stop signal: proactive slowing DDM-thresh: 76% motor selective stop signal: proactive control DDM-drift: 63% angling risk task always sunny: release coef of variation: logTr: 52% shift task: learning to learn: 46% angling risk task always sunny: keep coef of variation: 46% local global letter: global bias DDM-drift: 45% simon: DDM-drift: 43% shape matching: DDM-drift: 38% information sampling task: Decreasing Win P correct: 35% shift task: model decay: ReflogTr: 30% choice reaction time: DDM-drift: 26% shift task: model beta: logTr: 17% recent probes: proactive interference DDM-drift: 14%
attention network task: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr stim selective stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 98% simon: DDM-non-decision: 98% stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 98% stroop: DDM-non-decision: 98% choice reaction time: DDM-non-decision: logTr: 98% motor selective stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 97% stim selective stop signal: SSRT: 92% stop signal: SSRT low: 92% stop signal: SSRT high: logTr: 91% motor selective stop signal: SSRT: 91% stop signal: proactive SSRT speeding: 87% probabilistic selection: positive learning bias: 44%
attention network task: DDM-thresh go nogo: bias: 91% choice reaction time: DDM-thresh: 87% shape matching: DDM-thresh: logTr: 78% simon: DDM-thresh: 77% local global letter: conflict DDM-drift: 74% cue/task switch: DDM-thresh: logTr: 73% local global letter: DDM-thresh: 58% recent probes: DDM-thresh: 56% directed forgetting: DDM-thresh: 53% dietary decision: health-sensitivity: 48% stroop: stroop DDM-drift: 28% stop signal: proactive slowing DDM-drift: 22%
attention network task: orienting DDM-drift recent probes: DDM-drift: 80% directed forgetting: DDM-drift: 78% dot pattern expectancy: DDM-drift: 74% dot pattern expectancy: dprime: 71% cue/task switch: cue switch-cost DDM-drift: 65% shift task: model learning rate: 63% directed forgetting: proactive interference DDM-drift: logTr: 62% cue/task switch: DDM-drift: 62% simple reaction time: avg rt: logTr: 51% dietary decision: taste-sensitivity: 49% hierarchical rule: score: 34% local global letter: DDM-drift: 27%
bickel titrator: hyp discount rate large: logTr kirby: hyp discount rate large: logTr: 100% kirby: hyp discount rate small: logTr: 100% bickel titrator: hyp discount rate small: logTr: 100% bickel titrator: hyp discount rate medium: logTr: 100% discount titrate: percent patient: 99% columbia card task hot: avg cards chosen: 58%
bickel titrator: hyp discount rate medium: logTr kirby: hyp discount rate large: logTr: 100% kirby: hyp discount rate small: logTr: 100% bickel titrator: hyp discount rate small: logTr: 100% bickel titrator: hyp discount rate large: logTr: 100% discount titrate: percent patient: 99% columbia card task hot: avg cards chosen: 58%
bickel titrator: hyp discount rate small: logTr discount titrate: percent patient: 100% kirby: hyp discount rate large: logTr: 100% kirby: hyp discount rate small: logTr: 100% bickel titrator: hyp discount rate large: logTr: 100% bickel titrator: hyp discount rate medium: logTr: 100% columbia card task hot: avg cards chosen: 58%
choice reaction time: DDM-drift shape matching: DDM-drift: 88% simon: DDM-drift: 85% recent probes: proactive interference DDM-drift: 85% angling risk task always sunny: keep coef of variation: 76% shift task: learning to learn: 66% stim selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 46% local global letter: global bias DDM-drift: 44% go nogo: dprime: 42% stop signal: DDM-drift: 41% motor selective stop signal: proactive control DDM-drift: 40% stroop: DDM-drift: 39% motor selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 38% stop signal: proactive slowing DDM-thresh: 29% shift task: model decay: ReflogTr: 28% attention network task: DDM-drift: 26% information sampling task: Decreasing Win P correct: 18% shift task: model beta: logTr: 13% angling risk task always sunny: release coef of variation: logTr: 7%
choice reaction time: DDM-non-decision: logTr stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 99% simon: DDM-non-decision: 99% stim selective stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 99% stroop: DDM-non-decision: 99% motor selective stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 98% attention network task: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 98% stop signal: SSRT low: 95% stim selective stop signal: SSRT: 95% stop signal: SSRT high: logTr: 95% motor selective stop signal: SSRT: 94% stop signal: proactive SSRT speeding: 90% probabilistic selection: positive learning bias: 42%
choice reaction time: DDM-thresh go nogo: bias: 96% simon: DDM-thresh: 95% shape matching: DDM-thresh: logTr: 94% cue/task switch: DDM-thresh: logTr: 92% local global letter: conflict DDM-drift: 89% attention network task: DDM-thresh: 87% local global letter: DDM-thresh: 75% recent probes: DDM-thresh: 74% directed forgetting: DDM-thresh: 69% dietary decision: health-sensitivity: 60% stroop: stroop DDM-drift: 38% stop signal: proactive slowing DDM-drift: 27%
cognitive reflection survey: correct proportion cognitive reflection survey: intuitive proportion: 99% columbia card task cold: loss-sensitivity: 91% adaptive n back: mean load: logTr: 70% columbia card task hot: information use: 67% tower of london: num optimal solutions: 67% keep track: score: 66% digit span: forward span: 65% digit span: reverse span: 63% columbia card task cold: information use: 63% ravens: score: 59% two step decision: model based: 59% information sampling task: Fixed Win P correct: 59% shift task: learning rate: 58% shift task: acc: 44%
cognitive reflection survey: intuitive proportion cognitive reflection survey: correct proportion: 99% columbia card task cold: loss-sensitivity: 89% adaptive n back: mean load: logTr: 65% columbia card task hot: information use: 63% tower of london: num optimal solutions: 59% keep track: score: 59% digit span: forward span: 57% digit span: reverse span: 55% columbia card task cold: information use: 55% ravens: score: 51% two step decision: model based: 50% information sampling task: Fixed Win P correct: 50% shift task: learning rate: 50% shift task: acc: 37%
columbia card task cold: avg cards chosen two step decision: perseverance: 71% dot pattern expectancy: DDM-thresh: logTr: 64%
columbia card task cold: gain-sensitivity: logTr angling risk task always sunny: keep adjusted clicks: 98% two step decision: model free: 91% spatial span: forward span: 83% columbia card task hot: loss-sensitivity: ReflogTr: 82% columbia card task hot: gain-sensitivity: logTr: 82% spatial span: reverse span: 78% angling risk task always sunny: release adjusted clicks: 54% columbia card task hot: probability-sensitivity: 53%
columbia card task cold: information use digit span: reverse span: 99% digit span: forward span: 99% ravens: score: 98% information sampling task: Fixed Win P correct: 98% tower of london: num optimal solutions: 98% shift task: learning rate: 98% two step decision: model based: 95% keep track: score: 94% adaptive n back: mean load: logTr: 83% shift task: acc: 82% columbia card task hot: information use: 78% columbia card task cold: loss-sensitivity: 66% cognitive reflection survey: correct proportion: 63% cognitive reflection survey: intuitive proportion: 55%
columbia card task cold: loss-sensitivity cognitive reflection survey: correct proportion: 91% cognitive reflection survey: intuitive proportion: 89% adaptive n back: mean load: logTr: 76% columbia card task hot: information use: 73% keep track: score: 70% tower of london: num optimal solutions: 70% digit span: forward span: 69% digit span: reverse span: 67% columbia card task cold: information use: 66% ravens: score: 62% shift task: learning rate: 62% information sampling task: Fixed Win P correct: 62% two step decision: model based: 61% shift task: acc: 47%
columbia card task cold: probability-sensitivity attention network task: alerting DDM-drift: 79% cue/task switch: task switch-cost DDM-drift: 68% psychological refractory period two choices: PRP slope: 57%
columbia card task hot: avg cards chosen kirby: hyp discount rate large: logTr: 60% kirby: hyp discount rate small: logTr: 59% discount titrate: percent patient: 59% bickel titrator: hyp discount rate medium: logTr: 58% bickel titrator: hyp discount rate small: logTr: 58% bickel titrator: hyp discount rate large: logTr: 58%
columbia card task hot: gain-sensitivity: logTr angling risk task always sunny: keep adjusted clicks: 87% columbia card task hot: loss-sensitivity: ReflogTr: 84% columbia card task cold: gain-sensitivity: logTr: 82% spatial span: forward span: 82% spatial span: reverse span: 79% two step decision: model free: 76% columbia card task hot: probability-sensitivity: 55% angling risk task always sunny: release adjusted clicks: 54%
columbia card task hot: information use adaptive n back: mean load: logTr: 98% keep track: score: 89% tower of london: num optimal solutions: 79% digit span: forward span: 79% digit span: reverse span: 78% columbia card task cold: information use: 78% information sampling task: Fixed Win P correct: 75% ravens: score: 74% shift task: learning rate: 74% columbia card task cold: loss-sensitivity: 73% two step decision: model based: 71% cognitive reflection survey: correct proportion: 67% cognitive reflection survey: intuitive proportion: 63% shift task: acc: 62%
columbia card task hot: loss-sensitivity: ReflogTr spatial span: forward span: 99% spatial span: reverse span: 98% angling risk task always sunny: keep adjusted clicks: 86% columbia card task hot: gain-sensitivity: logTr: 84% columbia card task cold: gain-sensitivity: logTr: 82% columbia card task hot: probability-sensitivity: 74% two step decision: model free: 70% angling risk task always sunny: release adjusted clicks: 43%
columbia card task hot: probability-sensitivity spatial span: reverse span: 79% columbia card task hot: loss-sensitivity: ReflogTr: 74% spatial span: forward span: 73% columbia card task hot: gain-sensitivity: logTr: 55% angling risk task always sunny: keep adjusted clicks: 55% columbia card task cold: gain-sensitivity: logTr: 53% two step decision: model free: 42% angling risk task always sunny: release adjusted clicks: 26%
dietary decision: health-sensitivity local global letter: conflict DDM-drift: 73% cue/task switch: DDM-thresh: logTr: 68% simon: DDM-thresh: 67% shape matching: DDM-thresh: logTr: 65% local global letter: DDM-thresh: 62% choice reaction time: DDM-thresh: 60% directed forgetting: DDM-thresh: 60% recent probes: DDM-thresh: 59% go nogo: bias: 52% attention network task: DDM-thresh: 48% stroop: stroop DDM-drift: 37% stop signal: proactive slowing DDM-drift: 25%
dietary decision: taste-sensitivity hierarchical rule: score: 85% directed forgetting: proactive interference DDM-drift: logTr: 77% cue/task switch: DDM-drift: 74% local global letter: DDM-drift: 66% attention network task: orienting DDM-drift: 49% recent probes: DDM-drift: 45% directed forgetting: DDM-drift: 44% dot pattern expectancy: DDM-drift: 40% dot pattern expectancy: dprime: 39% shift task: model learning rate: 35% cue/task switch: cue switch-cost DDM-drift: 34% simple reaction time: avg rt: logTr: 26%
digit span: forward span digit span: reverse span: 99% columbia card task cold: information use: 99% tower of london: num optimal solutions: 98% ravens: score: 96% information sampling task: Fixed Win P correct: 96% shift task: learning rate: 96% two step decision: model based: 95% keep track: score: 94% adaptive n back: mean load: logTr: 84% shift task: acc: 80% columbia card task hot: information use: 79% columbia card task cold: loss-sensitivity: 69% cognitive reflection survey: correct proportion: 65% cognitive reflection survey: intuitive proportion: 57%
digit span: reverse span columbia card task cold: information use: 99% digit span: forward span: 99% tower of london: num optimal solutions: 97% information sampling task: Fixed Win P correct: 97% ravens: score: 97% shift task: learning rate: 97% two step decision: model based: 95% keep track: score: 94% adaptive n back: mean load: logTr: 83% shift task: acc: 82% columbia card task hot: information use: 78% columbia card task cold: loss-sensitivity: 67% cognitive reflection survey: correct proportion: 63% cognitive reflection survey: intuitive proportion: 55%
directed forgetting: DDM-drift recent probes: DDM-drift: 99% dot pattern expectancy: DDM-drift: 99% dot pattern expectancy: dprime: 97% cue/task switch: cue switch-cost DDM-drift: 87% attention network task: orienting DDM-drift: 78% cue/task switch: DDM-drift: 69% directed forgetting: proactive interference DDM-drift: logTr: 66% shift task: model learning rate: 46% dietary decision: taste-sensitivity: 44% simple reaction time: avg rt: logTr: 37% hierarchical rule: score: 26% local global letter: DDM-drift: 18%
directed forgetting: DDM-non-decision information sampling task: Decreasing Win motivation: 70% information sampling task: Fixed Win motivation: 63% motor selective stop signal: reactive control DDM-drift: 59% dot pattern expectancy: DDM-non-decision: 34% holt laury survey: beta: logTr: 26% local global letter: switch-cost DDM-drift: 10% adaptive n back: DDM-non-decision: 4%
directed forgetting: DDM-thresh local global letter: DDM-thresh: 98% recent probes: DDM-thresh: 81% cue/task switch: DDM-thresh: logTr: 80% shape matching: DDM-thresh: logTr: 78% simon: DDM-thresh: 77% local global letter: conflict DDM-drift: 73% choice reaction time: DDM-thresh: 69% stroop: stroop DDM-drift: 61% dietary decision: health-sensitivity: 60% go nogo: bias: 59% attention network task: DDM-thresh: 53% stop signal: proactive slowing DDM-drift: 38%
directed forgetting: proactive interference DDM-drift: logTr cue/task switch: DDM-drift: 87% dietary decision: taste-sensitivity: 77% recent probes: DDM-drift: 67% directed forgetting: DDM-drift: 66% attention network task: orienting DDM-drift: 62% dot pattern expectancy: DDM-drift: 62% dot pattern expectancy: dprime: 62% hierarchical rule: score: 58% cue/task switch: cue switch-cost DDM-drift: 54% local global letter: DDM-drift: 43% shift task: model learning rate: 43% simple reaction time: avg rt: logTr: 34%
discount titrate: percent patient kirby: hyp discount rate large: logTr: 100% kirby: hyp discount rate small: logTr: 100% bickel titrator: hyp discount rate small: logTr: 100% bickel titrator: hyp discount rate medium: logTr: 99% bickel titrator: hyp discount rate large: logTr: 99% columbia card task hot: avg cards chosen: 59%
dot pattern expectancy: AY-BY DDM-drift dot pattern expectancy: bias: 79% attention network task: conflict DDM-drift: ReflogTr: 74% cue/task switch: DDM-non-decision: 70% dot pattern expectancy: BX-BY DDM-drift: 68% stim selective stop signal: reactive control DDM-drift: 68% simon: simon DDM-drift: 51% shape matching: stimulus interference DDM-drift: 48% adaptive n back: DDM-drift: 45%
dot pattern expectancy: BX-BY DDM-drift dot pattern expectancy: bias: 89% stim selective stop signal: reactive control DDM-drift: 85% attention network task: conflict DDM-drift: ReflogTr: 75% cue/task switch: DDM-non-decision: 73% dot pattern expectancy: AY-BY DDM-drift: 68% simon: simon DDM-drift: 65% shape matching: stimulus interference DDM-drift: 62% adaptive n back: DDM-drift: 49%
dot pattern expectancy: bias stim selective stop signal: reactive control DDM-drift: 91% dot pattern expectancy: BX-BY DDM-drift: 89% attention network task: conflict DDM-drift: ReflogTr: 83% dot pattern expectancy: AY-BY DDM-drift: 79% cue/task switch: DDM-non-decision: 76% simon: simon DDM-drift: 62% shape matching: stimulus interference DDM-drift: 58% adaptive n back: DDM-drift: 46%
dot pattern expectancy: dprime dot pattern expectancy: DDM-drift: 99% directed forgetting: DDM-drift: 97% recent probes: DDM-drift: 96% cue/task switch: cue switch-cost DDM-drift: 90% attention network task: orienting DDM-drift: 71% cue/task switch: DDM-drift: 64% directed forgetting: proactive interference DDM-drift: logTr: 62% shift task: model learning rate: 41% dietary decision: taste-sensitivity: 39% simple reaction time: avg rt: logTr: 33% hierarchical rule: score: 20% local global letter: DDM-drift: 14%
dot pattern expectancy: DDM-drift dot pattern expectancy: dprime: 99% directed forgetting: DDM-drift: 99% recent probes: DDM-drift: 98% cue/task switch: cue switch-cost DDM-drift: 89% attention network task: orienting DDM-drift: 74% cue/task switch: DDM-drift: 63% directed forgetting: proactive interference DDM-drift: logTr: 62% shift task: model learning rate: 42% dietary decision: taste-sensitivity: 40% simple reaction time: avg rt: logTr: 33% hierarchical rule: score: 22% local global letter: DDM-drift: 15%
dot pattern expectancy: DDM-non-decision holt laury survey: beta: logTr: 73% information sampling task: Decreasing Win motivation: 70% information sampling task: Fixed Win motivation: 63% directed forgetting: DDM-non-decision: 34% motor selective stop signal: reactive control DDM-drift: 22% adaptive n back: DDM-non-decision: 12% local global letter: switch-cost DDM-drift: 5%
dot pattern expectancy: DDM-thresh: logTr two step decision: perseverance: 75% columbia card task cold: avg cards chosen: 64%
go nogo: bias choice reaction time: DDM-thresh: 96% attention network task: DDM-thresh: 91% simon: DDM-thresh: 85% shape matching: DDM-thresh: logTr: 84% cue/task switch: DDM-thresh: logTr: 81% local global letter: conflict DDM-drift: 80% local global letter: DDM-thresh: 64% recent probes: DDM-thresh: 63% directed forgetting: DDM-thresh: 59% dietary decision: health-sensitivity: 52% stroop: stroop DDM-drift: 31% stop signal: proactive slowing DDM-drift: 24%
go nogo: dprime stop signal: DDM-drift: 100% motor selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 99% stroop: DDM-drift: 99% stim selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 95% attention network task: DDM-drift: 84% stop signal: proactive slowing DDM-thresh: 82% motor selective stop signal: proactive control DDM-drift: 75% angling risk task always sunny: keep coef of variation: 64% simon: DDM-drift: 64% shift task: learning to learn: 63% local global letter: global bias DDM-drift: 59% shape matching: DDM-drift: 57% choice reaction time: DDM-drift: 42% shift task: model decay: ReflogTr: 40% information sampling task: Decreasing Win P correct: 34% angling risk task always sunny: release coef of variation: logTr: 32% recent probes: proactive interference DDM-drift: 24% shift task: model beta: logTr: 21%
hierarchical rule: score local global letter: DDM-drift: 90% dietary decision: taste-sensitivity: 85% directed forgetting: proactive interference DDM-drift: logTr: 58% cue/task switch: DDM-drift: 51% attention network task: orienting DDM-drift: 34% recent probes: DDM-drift: 26% directed forgetting: DDM-drift: 26% shift task: model learning rate: 23% dot pattern expectancy: DDM-drift: 22% dot pattern expectancy: dprime: 20% cue/task switch: cue switch-cost DDM-drift: 19% simple reaction time: avg rt: logTr: 16%
holt laury survey: beta: logTr dot pattern expectancy: DDM-non-decision: 73% information sampling task: Decreasing Win motivation: 49% information sampling task: Fixed Win motivation: 40% adaptive n back: DDM-non-decision: 31% directed forgetting: DDM-non-decision: 26% motor selective stop signal: reactive control DDM-drift: 24% local global letter: switch-cost DDM-drift: 17%
holt laury survey: risk aversion holt laury survey: safe choices: 85% adaptive n back: DDM-thresh: 73% adaptive n back: DDM-drift load: 73%
holt laury survey: safe choices holt laury survey: risk aversion: 85% adaptive n back: DDM-drift load: 81% adaptive n back: DDM-thresh: 76%
information sampling task: Decreasing Win P correct stop signal: proactive slowing DDM-thresh: 39% angling risk task always sunny: release coef of variation: logTr: 37% stroop: DDM-drift: 35% attention network task: DDM-drift: 35% motor selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 35% stim selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 34% stop signal: DDM-drift: 34% go nogo: dprime: 34% angling risk task always sunny: keep coef of variation: 26% simon: DDM-drift: 24% shape matching: DDM-drift: 23% motor selective stop signal: proactive control DDM-drift: 23% shift task: learning to learn: 23% choice reaction time: DDM-drift: 18% local global letter: global bias DDM-drift: 17% recent probes: proactive interference DDM-drift: 12% shift task: model decay: ReflogTr: 10% shift task: model beta: logTr: 5%
information sampling task: Decreasing Win motivation information sampling task: Fixed Win motivation: 96% directed forgetting: DDM-non-decision: 70% dot pattern expectancy: DDM-non-decision: 70% holt laury survey: beta: logTr: 49% motor selective stop signal: reactive control DDM-drift: 38% adaptive n back: DDM-non-decision: 8% local global letter: switch-cost DDM-drift: 7%
information sampling task: Fixed Win P correct shift task: learning rate: 99% ravens: score: 98% columbia card task cold: information use: 98% digit span: reverse span: 97% digit span: forward span: 96% two step decision: model based: 95% tower of london: num optimal solutions: 95% keep track: score: 92% shift task: acc: 87% adaptive n back: mean load: logTr: 80% columbia card task hot: information use: 75% columbia card task cold: loss-sensitivity: 62% cognitive reflection survey: correct proportion: 59% cognitive reflection survey: intuitive proportion: 50%
information sampling task: Fixed Win motivation information sampling task: Decreasing Win motivation: 96% directed forgetting: DDM-non-decision: 63% dot pattern expectancy: DDM-non-decision: 63% holt laury survey: beta: logTr: 40% motor selective stop signal: reactive control DDM-drift: 30% adaptive n back: DDM-non-decision: 5% local global letter: switch-cost DDM-drift: 4%
keep track: score columbia card task cold: information use: 94% digit span: forward span: 94% digit span: reverse span: 94% tower of london: num optimal solutions: 93% adaptive n back: mean load: logTr: 92% information sampling task: Fixed Win P correct: 92% shift task: learning rate: 92% ravens: score: 91% columbia card task hot: information use: 89% two step decision: model based: 88% shift task: acc: 76% columbia card task cold: loss-sensitivity: 70% cognitive reflection survey: correct proportion: 66% cognitive reflection survey: intuitive proportion: 59%
kirby: hyp discount rate large: logTr discount titrate: percent patient: 100% kirby: hyp discount rate small: logTr: 100% bickel titrator: hyp discount rate small: logTr: 100% bickel titrator: hyp discount rate large: logTr: 100% bickel titrator: hyp discount rate medium: logTr: 100% columbia card task hot: avg cards chosen: 60%
kirby: hyp discount rate small: logTr discount titrate: percent patient: 100% kirby: hyp discount rate large: logTr: 100% bickel titrator: hyp discount rate small: logTr: 100% bickel titrator: hyp discount rate large: logTr: 100% bickel titrator: hyp discount rate medium: logTr: 100% columbia card task hot: avg cards chosen: 59%
local global letter: conflict DDM-drift simon: DDM-thresh: 94% cue/task switch: DDM-thresh: logTr: 93% shape matching: DDM-thresh: logTr: 91% choice reaction time: DDM-thresh: 89% go nogo: bias: 80% local global letter: DDM-thresh: 78% recent probes: DDM-thresh: 75% attention network task: DDM-thresh: 74% directed forgetting: DDM-thresh: 73% dietary decision: health-sensitivity: 73% stroop: stroop DDM-drift: 41% stop signal: proactive slowing DDM-drift: 28%
local global letter: global bias DDM-drift motor selective stop signal: proactive control DDM-drift: 75% shift task: model decay: ReflogTr: 68% stim selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 60% stop signal: DDM-drift: 59% go nogo: dprime: 59% stroop: DDM-drift: 58% motor selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 58% simon: DDM-drift: 57% shift task: learning to learn: 55% angling risk task always sunny: keep coef of variation: 54% shape matching: DDM-drift: 53% attention network task: DDM-drift: 45% choice reaction time: DDM-drift: 44% shift task: model beta: logTr: 42% stop signal: proactive slowing DDM-thresh: 41% recent probes: proactive interference DDM-drift: 33% information sampling task: Decreasing Win P correct: 17% angling risk task always sunny: release coef of variation: logTr: 14%
local global letter: DDM-drift hierarchical rule: score: 90% dietary decision: taste-sensitivity: 66% directed forgetting: proactive interference DDM-drift: logTr: 43% cue/task switch: DDM-drift: 34% attention network task: orienting DDM-drift: 27% recent probes: DDM-drift: 19% shift task: model learning rate: 18% directed forgetting: DDM-drift: 18% dot pattern expectancy: DDM-drift: 15% dot pattern expectancy: dprime: 14% cue/task switch: cue switch-cost DDM-drift: 13% simple reaction time: avg rt: logTr: 12%
local global letter: DDM-non-decision recent probes: DDM-non-decision: 96% shape matching: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 62%
local global letter: DDM-thresh directed forgetting: DDM-thresh: 98% recent probes: DDM-thresh: 87% cue/task switch: DDM-thresh: logTr: 85% shape matching: DDM-thresh: logTr: 84% simon: DDM-thresh: 83% local global letter: conflict DDM-drift: 78% choice reaction time: DDM-thresh: 75% go nogo: bias: 64% dietary decision: health-sensitivity: 62% stroop: stroop DDM-drift: 62% attention network task: DDM-thresh: 58% stop signal: proactive slowing DDM-drift: 37%
local global letter: switch-cost DDM-drift motor selective stop signal: reactive control DDM-drift: 57% adaptive n back: DDM-non-decision: 37% holt laury survey: beta: logTr: 17% directed forgetting: DDM-non-decision: 10% information sampling task: Decreasing Win motivation: 7% dot pattern expectancy: DDM-non-decision: 5% information sampling task: Fixed Win motivation: 4%
motor selective stop signal: SSRT stop signal: SSRT high: logTr: 100% stop signal: SSRT low: 100% stim selective stop signal: SSRT: 100% motor selective stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 96% stop signal: proactive SSRT speeding: 95% stim selective stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 94% choice reaction time: DDM-non-decision: logTr: 94% stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 94% simon: DDM-non-decision: 93% stroop: DDM-non-decision: 91% attention network task: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 91% probabilistic selection: positive learning bias: 38%
motor selective stop signal: DDM-drift stop signal: DDM-drift: 100% stroop: DDM-drift: 100% go nogo: dprime: 99% stim selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 94% attention network task: DDM-drift: 88% stop signal: proactive slowing DDM-thresh: 82% motor selective stop signal: proactive control DDM-drift: 75% angling risk task always sunny: keep coef of variation: 61% shift task: learning to learn: 60% simon: DDM-drift: 60% local global letter: global bias DDM-drift: 58% shape matching: DDM-drift: 54% shift task: model decay: ReflogTr: 40% choice reaction time: DDM-drift: 38% information sampling task: Decreasing Win P correct: 35% angling risk task always sunny: release coef of variation: logTr: 34% shift task: model beta: logTr: 21% recent probes: proactive interference DDM-drift: 21%
motor selective stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr stim selective stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 99% stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 99% choice reaction time: DDM-non-decision: logTr: 98% simon: DDM-non-decision: 98% attention network task: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 97% stim selective stop signal: SSRT: 97% stroop: DDM-non-decision: 97% stop signal: SSRT low: 97% stop signal: SSRT high: logTr: 96% motor selective stop signal: SSRT: 96% stop signal: proactive SSRT speeding: 91% probabilistic selection: positive learning bias: 42%
motor selective stop signal: DDM-thresh: logTr stop signal: DDM-thresh: logTr: 100% stim selective stop signal: DDM-thresh: logTr: 100% stroop: DDM-thresh: logTr: 69%
motor selective stop signal: proactive control DDM-drift stim selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 77% stop signal: DDM-drift: 76% go nogo: dprime: 75% stroop: DDM-drift: 75% motor selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 75% local global letter: global bias DDM-drift: 75% attention network task: DDM-drift: 63% simon: DDM-drift: 58% angling risk task always sunny: keep coef of variation: 58% stop signal: proactive slowing DDM-thresh: 56% shift task: model decay: ReflogTr: 55% shift task: learning to learn: 55% shape matching: DDM-drift: 53% choice reaction time: DDM-drift: 40% shift task: model beta: logTr: 31% recent probes: proactive interference DDM-drift: 26% information sampling task: Decreasing Win P correct: 23% angling risk task always sunny: release coef of variation: logTr: 21%
motor selective stop signal: reactive control DDM-drift directed forgetting: DDM-non-decision: 59% local global letter: switch-cost DDM-drift: 57% information sampling task: Decreasing Win motivation: 38% information sampling task: Fixed Win motivation: 30% holt laury survey: beta: logTr: 24% dot pattern expectancy: DDM-non-decision: 22% adaptive n back: DDM-non-decision: 18%
probabilistic selection: positive learning bias stroop: DDM-non-decision: 45% attention network task: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 44% simon: DDM-non-decision: 43% choice reaction time: DDM-non-decision: logTr: 42% stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 42% stim selective stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 42% motor selective stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 42% stim selective stop signal: SSRT: 38% stop signal: SSRT low: 38% motor selective stop signal: SSRT: 38% stop signal: SSRT high: logTr: 38% stop signal: proactive SSRT speeding: 36%
psychological refractory period two choices: PRP slope attention network task: alerting DDM-drift: 73% columbia card task cold: probability-sensitivity: 57% cue/task switch: task switch-cost DDM-drift: 55%
ravens: score shift task: learning rate: 98% columbia card task cold: information use: 98% information sampling task: Fixed Win P correct: 98% two step decision: model based: 98% digit span: reverse span: 97% digit span: forward span: 96% tower of london: num optimal solutions: 95% keep track: score: 91% shift task: acc: 84% adaptive n back: mean load: logTr: 79% columbia card task hot: information use: 74% columbia card task cold: loss-sensitivity: 62% cognitive reflection survey: correct proportion: 59% cognitive reflection survey: intuitive proportion: 51%
recent probes: DDM-drift directed forgetting: DDM-drift: 99% dot pattern expectancy: DDM-drift: 98% dot pattern expectancy: dprime: 96% cue/task switch: cue switch-cost DDM-drift: 87% attention network task: orienting DDM-drift: 80% cue/task switch: DDM-drift: 68% directed forgetting: proactive interference DDM-drift: logTr: 67% shift task: model learning rate: 46% dietary decision: taste-sensitivity: 45% simple reaction time: avg rt: logTr: 36% hierarchical rule: score: 26% local global letter: DDM-drift: 19%
recent probes: DDM-non-decision local global letter: DDM-non-decision: 96% shape matching: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 76%
recent probes: DDM-thresh local global letter: DDM-thresh: 87% cue/task switch: DDM-thresh: logTr: 86% shape matching: DDM-thresh: logTr: 82% simon: DDM-thresh: 82% directed forgetting: DDM-thresh: 81% local global letter: conflict DDM-drift: 75% choice reaction time: DDM-thresh: 74% stroop: stroop DDM-drift: 65% go nogo: bias: 63% dietary decision: health-sensitivity: 59% attention network task: DDM-thresh: 56% stop signal: proactive slowing DDM-drift: 36%
recent probes: proactive interference DDM-drift choice reaction time: DDM-drift: 85% shape matching: DDM-drift: 68% simon: DDM-drift: 64% angling risk task always sunny: keep coef of variation: 58% shift task: learning to learn: 52% local global letter: global bias DDM-drift: 33% stim selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 28% motor selective stop signal: proactive control DDM-drift: 26% go nogo: dprime: 24% stop signal: DDM-drift: 23% shift task: model decay: ReflogTr: 23% stroop: DDM-drift: 22% motor selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 21% stop signal: proactive slowing DDM-thresh: 16% attention network task: DDM-drift: 14% information sampling task: Decreasing Win P correct: 12% shift task: model beta: logTr: 10% angling risk task always sunny: release coef of variation: logTr: 3%
shape matching: DDM-drift simon: DDM-drift: 99% angling risk task always sunny: keep coef of variation: 91% choice reaction time: DDM-drift: 88% shift task: learning to learn: 70% recent probes: proactive interference DDM-drift: 68% stim selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 64% go nogo: dprime: 57% stop signal: DDM-drift: 56% stroop: DDM-drift: 54% motor selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 54% motor selective stop signal: proactive control DDM-drift: 53% local global letter: global bias DDM-drift: 53% stop signal: proactive slowing DDM-thresh: 41% attention network task: DDM-drift: 38% shift task: model decay: ReflogTr: 34% information sampling task: Decreasing Win P correct: 23% shift task: model beta: logTr: 15% angling risk task always sunny: release coef of variation: logTr: 11%
shape matching: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr recent probes: DDM-non-decision: 76% local global letter: DDM-non-decision: 62%
shape matching: DDM-thresh: logTr simon: DDM-thresh: 97% cue/task switch: DDM-thresh: logTr: 96% choice reaction time: DDM-thresh: 94% local global letter: conflict DDM-drift: 91% local global letter: DDM-thresh: 84% go nogo: bias: 84% recent probes: DDM-thresh: 82% attention network task: DDM-thresh: 78% directed forgetting: DDM-thresh: 78% dietary decision: health-sensitivity: 65% stroop: stroop DDM-drift: 44% stop signal: proactive slowing DDM-drift: 31%
shape matching: stimulus interference DDM-drift simon: simon DDM-drift: 99% adaptive n back: DDM-drift: 79% cue/task switch: DDM-non-decision: 63% dot pattern expectancy: BX-BY DDM-drift: 62% attention network task: conflict DDM-drift: ReflogTr: 59% dot pattern expectancy: bias: 58% dot pattern expectancy: AY-BY DDM-drift: 48% stim selective stop signal: reactive control DDM-drift: 47%
shift task: acc shift task: learning rate: 87% information sampling task: Fixed Win P correct: 87% ravens: score: 84% columbia card task cold: information use: 82% two step decision: model based: 82% digit span: reverse span: 82% digit span: forward span: 80% tower of london: num optimal solutions: 79% keep track: score: 76% adaptive n back: mean load: logTr: 65% columbia card task hot: information use: 62% columbia card task cold: loss-sensitivity: 47% cognitive reflection survey: correct proportion: 44% cognitive reflection survey: intuitive proportion: 37%
shift task: learning rate information sampling task: Fixed Win P correct: 99% ravens: score: 98% columbia card task cold: information use: 98% digit span: reverse span: 97% digit span: forward span: 96% two step decision: model based: 95% tower of london: num optimal solutions: 95% keep track: score: 92% shift task: acc: 87% adaptive n back: mean load: logTr: 79% columbia card task hot: information use: 74% columbia card task cold: loss-sensitivity: 62% cognitive reflection survey: correct proportion: 58% cognitive reflection survey: intuitive proportion: 50%
shift task: learning to learn simon: DDM-drift: 72% shape matching: DDM-drift: 70% angling risk task always sunny: keep coef of variation: 67% choice reaction time: DDM-drift: 66% go nogo: dprime: 63% stim selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 63% stop signal: DDM-drift: 62% motor selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 60% stroop: DDM-drift: 60% local global letter: global bias DDM-drift: 55% motor selective stop signal: proactive control DDM-drift: 55% recent probes: proactive interference DDM-drift: 52% stop signal: proactive slowing DDM-thresh: 49% attention network task: DDM-drift: 46% shift task: model decay: ReflogTr: 45% shift task: model beta: logTr: 27% information sampling task: Decreasing Win P correct: 23% angling risk task always sunny: release coef of variation: logTr: 15%
shift task: model beta: logTr shift task: model decay: ReflogTr: 76% local global letter: global bias DDM-drift: 42% motor selective stop signal: proactive control DDM-drift: 31% shift task: learning to learn: 27% stop signal: DDM-drift: 22% go nogo: dprime: 21% motor selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 21% stroop: DDM-drift: 21% stim selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 19% attention network task: DDM-drift: 17% simon: DDM-drift: 17% angling risk task always sunny: keep coef of variation: 16% stop signal: proactive slowing DDM-thresh: 15% shape matching: DDM-drift: 15% choice reaction time: DDM-drift: 13% recent probes: proactive interference DDM-drift: 10% angling risk task always sunny: release coef of variation: logTr: 5% information sampling task: Decreasing Win P correct: 5%
shift task: model decay: ReflogTr shift task: model beta: logTr: 76% local global letter: global bias DDM-drift: 68% motor selective stop signal: proactive control DDM-drift: 55% shift task: learning to learn: 45% stop signal: DDM-drift: 40% go nogo: dprime: 40% motor selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 40% stim selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 40% stroop: DDM-drift: 39% simon: DDM-drift: 37% angling risk task always sunny: keep coef of variation: 35% shape matching: DDM-drift: 34% attention network task: DDM-drift: 30% choice reaction time: DDM-drift: 28% stop signal: proactive slowing DDM-thresh: 27% recent probes: proactive interference DDM-drift: 23% information sampling task: Decreasing Win P correct: 10% angling risk task always sunny: release coef of variation: logTr: 8%
shift task: model learning rate simple reaction time: avg rt: logTr: 94% attention network task: orienting DDM-drift: 63% cue/task switch: DDM-drift: 46% recent probes: DDM-drift: 46% directed forgetting: DDM-drift: 46% directed forgetting: proactive interference DDM-drift: logTr: 43% dot pattern expectancy: DDM-drift: 42% dot pattern expectancy: dprime: 41% cue/task switch: cue switch-cost DDM-drift: 37% dietary decision: taste-sensitivity: 35% hierarchical rule: score: 23% local global letter: DDM-drift: 18%
simon: DDM-drift shape matching: DDM-drift: 99% angling risk task always sunny: keep coef of variation: 92% choice reaction time: DDM-drift: 85% shift task: learning to learn: 72% stim selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 70% go nogo: dprime: 64% recent probes: proactive interference DDM-drift: 64% stop signal: DDM-drift: 62% stroop: DDM-drift: 60% motor selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 60% motor selective stop signal: proactive control DDM-drift: 58% local global letter: global bias DDM-drift: 57% stop signal: proactive slowing DDM-thresh: 46% attention network task: DDM-drift: 43% shift task: model decay: ReflogTr: 37% information sampling task: Decreasing Win P correct: 24% shift task: model beta: logTr: 17% angling risk task always sunny: release coef of variation: logTr: 13%
simon: DDM-non-decision stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 99% choice reaction time: DDM-non-decision: logTr: 99% stroop: DDM-non-decision: 99% stim selective stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 99% attention network task: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 98% motor selective stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 98% stop signal: SSRT low: 94% stim selective stop signal: SSRT: 94% stop signal: SSRT high: logTr: 94% motor selective stop signal: SSRT: 93% stop signal: proactive SSRT speeding: 88% probabilistic selection: positive learning bias: 43%
simon: DDM-thresh cue/task switch: DDM-thresh: logTr: 99% shape matching: DDM-thresh: logTr: 97% choice reaction time: DDM-thresh: 95% local global letter: conflict DDM-drift: 94% go nogo: bias: 85% local global letter: DDM-thresh: 83% recent probes: DDM-thresh: 82% directed forgetting: DDM-thresh: 77% attention network task: DDM-thresh: 77% dietary decision: health-sensitivity: 67% stroop: stroop DDM-drift: 45% stop signal: proactive slowing DDM-drift: 29%
simon: simon DDM-drift shape matching: stimulus interference DDM-drift: 99% adaptive n back: DDM-drift: 76% dot pattern expectancy: BX-BY DDM-drift: 65% cue/task switch: DDM-non-decision: 64% attention network task: conflict DDM-drift: ReflogTr: 63% dot pattern expectancy: bias: 62% stim selective stop signal: reactive control DDM-drift: 51% dot pattern expectancy: AY-BY DDM-drift: 51%
simple reaction time: avg rt: logTr shift task: model learning rate: 94% attention network task: orienting DDM-drift: 51% cue/task switch: DDM-drift: 38% directed forgetting: DDM-drift: 37% recent probes: DDM-drift: 36% directed forgetting: proactive interference DDM-drift: logTr: 34% dot pattern expectancy: DDM-drift: 33% dot pattern expectancy: dprime: 33% cue/task switch: cue switch-cost DDM-drift: 30% dietary decision: taste-sensitivity: 26% hierarchical rule: score: 16% local global letter: DDM-drift: 12%
spatial span: forward span spatial span: reverse span: 99% columbia card task hot: loss-sensitivity: ReflogTr: 99% angling risk task always sunny: keep adjusted clicks: 86% columbia card task cold: gain-sensitivity: logTr: 83% columbia card task hot: gain-sensitivity: logTr: 82% columbia card task hot: probability-sensitivity: 73% two step decision: model free: 70% angling risk task always sunny: release adjusted clicks: 42%
spatial span: reverse span spatial span: forward span: 99% columbia card task hot: loss-sensitivity: ReflogTr: 98% angling risk task always sunny: keep adjusted clicks: 82% columbia card task hot: probability-sensitivity: 79% columbia card task hot: gain-sensitivity: logTr: 79% columbia card task cold: gain-sensitivity: logTr: 78% two step decision: model free: 65% angling risk task always sunny: release adjusted clicks: 39%
stim selective stop signal: SSRT stop signal: SSRT high: logTr: 100% stop signal: SSRT low: 100% motor selective stop signal: SSRT: 100% motor selective stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 97% stop signal: proactive SSRT speeding: 95% stim selective stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 95% choice reaction time: DDM-non-decision: logTr: 95% stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 94% simon: DDM-non-decision: 94% stroop: DDM-non-decision: 92% attention network task: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 92% probabilistic selection: positive learning bias: 38%
stim selective stop signal: DDM-drift go nogo: dprime: 95% stop signal: DDM-drift: 95% stroop: DDM-drift: 94% motor selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 94% attention network task: DDM-drift: 79% motor selective stop signal: proactive control DDM-drift: 77% stop signal: proactive slowing DDM-thresh: 75% angling risk task always sunny: keep coef of variation: 72% simon: DDM-drift: 70% shape matching: DDM-drift: 64% shift task: learning to learn: 63% local global letter: global bias DDM-drift: 60% choice reaction time: DDM-drift: 46% shift task: model decay: ReflogTr: 40% information sampling task: Decreasing Win P correct: 34% angling risk task always sunny: release coef of variation: logTr: 30% recent probes: proactive interference DDM-drift: 28% shift task: model beta: logTr: 19%
stim selective stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr motor selective stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 99% stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 99% choice reaction time: DDM-non-decision: logTr: 99% simon: DDM-non-decision: 99% attention network task: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 98% stroop: DDM-non-decision: 98% stim selective stop signal: SSRT: 95% stop signal: SSRT high: logTr: 95% stop signal: SSRT low: 95% motor selective stop signal: SSRT: 94% stop signal: proactive SSRT speeding: 90% probabilistic selection: positive learning bias: 42%
stim selective stop signal: DDM-thresh: logTr motor selective stop signal: DDM-thresh: logTr: 100% stop signal: DDM-thresh: logTr: 99% stroop: DDM-thresh: logTr: 66%
stim selective stop signal: reactive control DDM-drift dot pattern expectancy: bias: 91% dot pattern expectancy: BX-BY DDM-drift: 85% attention network task: conflict DDM-drift: ReflogTr: 75% dot pattern expectancy: AY-BY DDM-drift: 68% cue/task switch: DDM-non-decision: 61% simon: simon DDM-drift: 51% shape matching: stimulus interference DDM-drift: 47% adaptive n back: DDM-drift: 35%
stop signal: SSRT high: logTr stop signal: SSRT low: 100% motor selective stop signal: SSRT: 100% stim selective stop signal: SSRT: 100% motor selective stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 96% stop signal: proactive SSRT speeding: 95% stim selective stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 95% choice reaction time: DDM-non-decision: logTr: 95% stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 94% simon: DDM-non-decision: 94% stroop: DDM-non-decision: 92% attention network task: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 91% probabilistic selection: positive learning bias: 38%
stop signal: SSRT low stop signal: SSRT high: logTr: 100% motor selective stop signal: SSRT: 100% stim selective stop signal: SSRT: 100% motor selective stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 97% stop signal: proactive SSRT speeding: 95% choice reaction time: DDM-non-decision: logTr: 95% stim selective stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 95% stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 94% simon: DDM-non-decision: 94% stroop: DDM-non-decision: 92% attention network task: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 92% probabilistic selection: positive learning bias: 38%
stop signal: DDM-drift go nogo: dprime: 100% motor selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 100% stroop: DDM-drift: 99% stim selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 95% attention network task: DDM-drift: 86% stop signal: proactive slowing DDM-thresh: 82% motor selective stop signal: proactive control DDM-drift: 76% angling risk task always sunny: keep coef of variation: 63% simon: DDM-drift: 62% shift task: learning to learn: 62% local global letter: global bias DDM-drift: 59% shape matching: DDM-drift: 56% choice reaction time: DDM-drift: 41% shift task: model decay: ReflogTr: 40% information sampling task: Decreasing Win P correct: 34% angling risk task always sunny: release coef of variation: logTr: 32% recent probes: proactive interference DDM-drift: 23% shift task: model beta: logTr: 22%
stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr choice reaction time: DDM-non-decision: logTr: 99% simon: DDM-non-decision: 99% stim selective stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 99% motor selective stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 99% stroop: DDM-non-decision: 98% attention network task: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 98% stim selective stop signal: SSRT: 94% stop signal: SSRT low: 94% stop signal: SSRT high: logTr: 94% motor selective stop signal: SSRT: 94% stop signal: proactive SSRT speeding: 89% probabilistic selection: positive learning bias: 42%
stop signal: DDM-thresh: logTr motor selective stop signal: DDM-thresh: logTr: 100% stim selective stop signal: DDM-thresh: logTr: 99% stroop: DDM-thresh: logTr: 63%
stop signal: proactive SSRT speeding motor selective stop signal: SSRT: 95% stim selective stop signal: SSRT: 95% stop signal: SSRT low: 95% stop signal: SSRT high: logTr: 95% motor selective stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 91% choice reaction time: DDM-non-decision: logTr: 90% stim selective stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 90% stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 89% simon: DDM-non-decision: 88% stroop: DDM-non-decision: 87% attention network task: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 87% probabilistic selection: positive learning bias: 36%
stop signal: proactive slowing DDM-drift stroop: stroop DDM-drift: 38% directed forgetting: DDM-thresh: 38% local global letter: DDM-thresh: 37% recent probes: DDM-thresh: 36% cue/task switch: DDM-thresh: logTr: 31% shape matching: DDM-thresh: logTr: 31% simon: DDM-thresh: 29% local global letter: conflict DDM-drift: 28% choice reaction time: DDM-thresh: 27% dietary decision: health-sensitivity: 25% go nogo: bias: 24% attention network task: DDM-thresh: 22%
stop signal: proactive slowing DDM-thresh stroop: DDM-drift: 82% motor selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 82% stop signal: DDM-drift: 82% go nogo: dprime: 82% attention network task: DDM-drift: 76% stim selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 75% motor selective stop signal: proactive control DDM-drift: 56% shift task: learning to learn: 49% angling risk task always sunny: keep coef of variation: 47% simon: DDM-drift: 46% local global letter: global bias DDM-drift: 41% shape matching: DDM-drift: 41% information sampling task: Decreasing Win P correct: 39% angling risk task always sunny: release coef of variation: logTr: 36% choice reaction time: DDM-drift: 29% shift task: model decay: ReflogTr: 27% recent probes: proactive interference DDM-drift: 16% shift task: model beta: logTr: 15%
stroop: DDM-drift motor selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 100% stop signal: DDM-drift: 99% go nogo: dprime: 99% stim selective stop signal: DDM-drift: 94% attention network task: DDM-drift: 88% stop signal: proactive slowing DDM-thresh: 82% motor selective stop signal: proactive control DDM-drift: 75% angling risk task always sunny: keep coef of variation: 61% simon: DDM-drift: 60% shift task: learning to learn: 60% local global letter: global bias DDM-drift: 58% shape matching: DDM-drift: 54% shift task: model decay: ReflogTr: 39% choice reaction time: DDM-drift: 39% information sampling task: Decreasing Win P correct: 35% angling risk task always sunny: release coef of variation: logTr: 34% recent probes: proactive interference DDM-drift: 22% shift task: model beta: logTr: 21%
stroop: DDM-non-decision simon: DDM-non-decision: 99% choice reaction time: DDM-non-decision: logTr: 99% stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 98% attention network task: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 98% stim selective stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 98% motor selective stop signal: DDM-non-decision: ReflogTr: 97% stim selective stop signal: SSRT: 92% stop signal: SSRT low: 92% stop signal: SSRT high: logTr: 92% motor selective stop signal: SSRT: 91% stop signal: proactive SSRT speeding: 87% probabilistic selection: positive learning bias: 45%
stroop: DDM-thresh: logTr motor selective stop signal: DDM-thresh: logTr: 69% stim selective stop signal: DDM-thresh: logTr: 66% stop signal: DDM-thresh: logTr: 63%
stroop: stroop DDM-drift recent probes: DDM-thresh: 65% local global letter: DDM-thresh: 62% directed forgetting: DDM-thresh: 61% cue/task switch: DDM-thresh: logTr: 47% simon: DDM-thresh: 45% shape matching: DDM-thresh: logTr: 44% local global letter: conflict DDM-drift: 41% stop signal: proactive slowing DDM-drift: 38% choice reaction time: DDM-thresh: 38% dietary decision: health-sensitivity: 37% go nogo: bias: 31% attention network task: DDM-thresh: 28%
cue/task switch: cue switch-cost DDM-drift dot pattern expectancy: dprime: 90% dot pattern expectancy: DDM-drift: 89% directed forgetting: DDM-drift: 87% recent probes: DDM-drift: 87% attention network task: orienting DDM-drift: 65% cue/task switch: DDM-drift: 56% directed forgetting: proactive interference DDM-drift: logTr: 54% shift task: model learning rate: 37% dietary decision: taste-sensitivity: 34% simple reaction time: avg rt: logTr: 30% hierarchical rule: score: 19% local global letter: DDM-drift: 13%
cue/task switch: DDM-drift directed forgetting: proactive interference DDM-drift: logTr: 87% dietary decision: taste-sensitivity: 74% directed forgetting: DDM-drift: 69% recent probes: DDM-drift: 68% dot pattern expectancy: dprime: 64% dot pattern expectancy: DDM-drift: 63% attention network task: orienting DDM-drift: 62% cue/task switch: cue switch-cost DDM-drift: 56% hierarchical rule: score: 51% shift task: model learning rate: 46% simple reaction time: avg rt: logTr: 38% local global letter: DDM-drift: 34%
cue/task switch: DDM-non-decision dot pattern expectancy: bias: 76% dot pattern expectancy: BX-BY DDM-drift: 73% dot pattern expectancy: AY-BY DDM-drift: 70% simon: simon DDM-drift: 64% adaptive n back: DDM-drift: 63% shape matching: stimulus interference DDM-drift: 63% attention network task: conflict DDM-drift: ReflogTr: 63% stim selective stop signal: reactive control DDM-drift: 61%
cue/task switch: DDM-thresh: logTr simon: DDM-thresh: 99% shape matching: DDM-thresh: logTr: 96% local global letter: conflict DDM-drift: 93% choice reaction time: DDM-thresh: 92% recent probes: DDM-thresh: 86% local global letter: DDM-thresh: 85% go nogo: bias: 81% directed forgetting: DDM-thresh: 80% attention network task: DDM-thresh: 73% dietary decision: health-sensitivity: 68% stroop: stroop DDM-drift: 47% stop signal: proactive slowing DDM-drift: 31%
cue/task switch: task switch-cost DDM-drift attention network task: alerting DDM-drift: 89% columbia card task cold: probability-sensitivity: 68% psychological refractory period two choices: PRP slope: 55%
tower of london: avg move time: logTr tower of london: planning time: 78% tower of london: num extra moves: 60% writing task: positive probability: 48% writing task: neutral probability: 28%
tower of london: num extra moves tower of london: planning time: 90% writing task: positive probability: 89% tower of london: avg move time: logTr: 60% writing task: neutral probability: 54%
tower of london: num optimal solutions columbia card task cold: information use: 98% digit span: forward span: 98% digit span: reverse span: 97% ravens: score: 95% information sampling task: Fixed Win P correct: 95% shift task: learning rate: 95% keep track: score: 93% two step decision: model based: 93% adaptive n back: mean load: logTr: 84% columbia card task hot: information use: 79% shift task: acc: 79% columbia card task cold: loss-sensitivity: 70% cognitive reflection survey: correct proportion: 67% cognitive reflection survey: intuitive proportion: 59%
tower of london: planning time tower of london: num extra moves: 90% writing task: positive probability: 79% tower of london: avg move time: logTr: 78% writing task: neutral probability: 51%
two step decision: model based ravens: score: 98% columbia card task cold: information use: 95% digit span: reverse span: 95% information sampling task: Fixed Win P correct: 95% shift task: learning rate: 95% digit span: forward span: 95% tower of london: num optimal solutions: 93% keep track: score: 88% shift task: acc: 82% adaptive n back: mean load: logTr: 77% columbia card task hot: information use: 71% columbia card task cold: loss-sensitivity: 61% cognitive reflection survey: correct proportion: 59% cognitive reflection survey: intuitive proportion: 50%
two step decision: model free columbia card task cold: gain-sensitivity: logTr: 91% angling risk task always sunny: keep adjusted clicks: 89% columbia card task hot: gain-sensitivity: logTr: 76% spatial span: forward span: 70% columbia card task hot: loss-sensitivity: ReflogTr: 70% spatial span: reverse span: 65% angling risk task always sunny: release adjusted clicks: 58% columbia card task hot: probability-sensitivity: 42%
two step decision: perseverance dot pattern expectancy: DDM-thresh: logTr: 75% columbia card task cold: avg cards chosen: 71%
writing task: neutral probability writing task: positive probability: 66% tower of london: num extra moves: 54% tower of london: planning time: 51% tower of london: avg move time: logTr: 28%
writing task: positive probability tower of london: num extra moves: 89% tower of london: planning time: 79% writing task: neutral probability: 66% tower of london: avg move time: logTr: 48%